Hi. I'd just like to speak in favor of anonymous Internet. Yes there
needs to be a balance, but honestly, if there wern't ways to get
anonymous internet I'd consider it a big problem.
___
Ietf mailing list
Ietf@ietf.org
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sam Hartman writes:
Hi. I'd just like to speak in favor of anonymous Internet. Yes there
needs to be a balance, but honestly, if there wern't ways to get
anonymous internet I'd consider it a big problem.
Strong second.
--Steven M. Bellovin,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:30:31AM -0800, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
The result is that 70% of wireless access points are open and can be
used by Internet criminals to achieve anonymous access.
Loaded statement? Check.
Precise statement? Check.
Supported statement? H.
--
Ted Faber
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:23:49PM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ted Faber writes:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:30:31AM -0800, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
The result is that 70% of wireless access points are open and can be
used by Internet criminals to
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| On Behalf Of Ted Faber
| Sent: Thursday, January 19, 2006 5:57 AM
| To: ietf@ietf.org
| Subject: Re: Wireless at IETF
|
| On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:30:31AM -0800, Hallam-Baker,
| Phillip wrote:
| The result
On 18-Jan-2006, at 15:35, Dassa wrote:
I don't see the 70% of access points being open actually. My own
figures
indicate less than 20% within the local area, information from
capital cities
tends to suggest a slightly higher figure but certainly not that high.
It depends a lot on the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted Faber
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:23:49PM -0500, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Ted Faber writes:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:30:31AM -0800, Hallam-Baker,
Phillip wrote:
The result is that
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 02:25:56PM -0800, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
Well, none of it's supported. Your statement above about
informal measurements is support for your statement of 70%
and indirectly of his.
The figure came from a presentation at an (anti-) Internet crime
meeting. I
2 parts to this message, read it all for twice the fun :-)
Given the amount of damage due to time wasted for other participants,
it might be worthwhile to print it up ahead of time and include it in
the registration packet. The cost of a ream of paper is small
relative to the lost
This gives a summary :
http://blogs.washingtonpost.com/securityfix/2006/01/windows_feature.html
Regards
Marshall
On Jan 15, 2006, at 3:23 PM, Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
http://www.nmrc.org/pub/present/shmoocon-2006-sn.ppt describes what
seems to explain the appearance of IETF6x named
I think (and suggested to the IAOC) that there should be
an information sheet and / or web site for each meeting with
information on how to determine Ad Hoc Mode, how
to turn it off, etc., for all major OS choices.
Regards
Marshall
On Jan 15, 2006, at 4:10 PM, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
At 10:10 PM +0100 1/15/06, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
Suggestion: Make instructions *with screenshots* of how to turn off
ad hoc mode on Windows XP available at the next IETF.
Given the amount of damage due to time wasted for other participants,
it might be worthwhile to print it up ahead
On 15-Jan-2006, at 17:33, Paul Hoffman wrote:
At 10:10 PM +0100 1/15/06, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
Suggestion: Make instructions *with screenshots* of how to turn
off ad hoc mode on Windows XP available at the next IETF.
Given the amount of damage due to time wasted for other
At 01:45 PM 10/12/99 -0700, Stuart Cheshire [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll give you a free Wireless Access Point(10BaseT to wireless ethernet
bridge) and a PCMCIA Wireless NIC if you can provide a functioning
driver by 8:00am on Sunday Nov. 6th for one of the following platforms
MacOS (PowerPC,
14 matches
Mail list logo
