Bill Cunningham wrote:
>I've noticed they've confused axioms
>which are taken to be true as a ground work for something with Euclidean
>postulates, which are truths to be self evident.
>
>
(a) You have that backwards. Euclid had axioms, which were taken as
self-evident (e.g., "things equal to
Here's my interpretation of rfc 871.
The ARPANET designers, whose work we take up, wanted an open design, and
knew terms were going to be confused. They also knew that the precision that
other models like OSI would get it more attention but also limit the model.
Standardization of terms do
Well I've read RFC 871 like some have wanted me too.
I haven't seen what I'm supposed to see, can someone explain to me what is
it's purpose in the TCP/IP discussion? I've noticed they've confused axioms
which are taken to be true as a ground work for something wi
