Re: Revising I-Ds became painful

2011-04-21 Thread Tony Hansen
On 4/20/2011 1:18 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: ... 2. RFC XML has changed. It seem like xml.resource.org has a new xml compiler. I had a lot of trouble in compiling my existing xml files. I am OK with improving RFC XML but why not keep upward compatibility? An optional strict checker was added

Re: Revising I-Ds became painful

2011-04-21 Thread Brian E Carpenter
On 2011-04-21 17:18, Glen Zorn wrote: On 4/21/2011 12:18 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: Hi, It seems like I-D submission for a revised draft (after expiration) encounters so many new hurdles: 1. Version number. Submission page complains about the version number even though it is

Revising I-Ds became painful

2011-04-20 Thread Behcet Sarikaya
Hi, It seems like I-D submission for a revised draft (after expiration) encounters so many new hurdles: 1. Version number. Submission page complains about the version number even though it is correct. This seems to be because the system keeps the expiration message in html format as the new

Re: Revising I-Ds became painful

2011-04-20 Thread Glen Zorn
On 4/21/2011 12:18 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote: Hi, It seems like I-D submission for a revised draft (after expiration) encounters so many new hurdles: 1. Version number. Submission page complains about the version number even though it is correct. This seems to be because the system