On 4/20/2011 1:18 PM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
...
2. RFC XML has changed. It seem like
xml.resource.org has a new xml compiler. I had a lot of trouble in compiling my
existing xml files. I am OK with improving RFC XML but why not keep upward
compatibility?
An optional strict checker was added
On 2011-04-21 17:18, Glen Zorn wrote:
On 4/21/2011 12:18 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
Hi,
It seems like I-D submission for a revised draft (after expiration)
encounters
so many new hurdles:
1. Version number. Submission page complains about the version number even
though it is
Hi,
It seems like I-D submission for a revised draft (after expiration)
encounters
so many new hurdles:
1. Version number. Submission page complains about the version number even
though it is correct. This seems to be because the system keeps the expiration
message in html format as the new
On 4/21/2011 12:18 AM, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
Hi,
It seems like I-D submission for a revised draft (after expiration)
encounters
so many new hurdles:
1. Version number. Submission page complains about the version number even
though it is correct. This seems to be because the system