Hi,
--On October 12, 2009 9:04:28 PM -0700 Fred Baker f...@cisco.com wrote:
Is there any planned ad-hoc meeting/session related to this topic in
Hiroshima meeting?
Well, ROLL and 6lowpan are relevant.
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki and specifically
NIST has issued its formal request for comments on the NIST Framework and
Roadmap for Smart Grid Interoperability Standards, Release 1.0.
As I noted in a previous message this extremely important to the evolution,
reliability and security of not just the Electricity Grid but to the
Internet
Is there any planned ad-hoc meeting/session related to this topic in
Hiroshima meeting?
Peny
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:47 AM, Fred Baker f...@cisco.com wrote:
Thanks. You already know this, as does Russ Housley, but I'll say it out
loud for others to hear.
At the third NIST workshop on the
On Oct 12, 2009, at 5:18 PM, Peny Yang wrote:
Is there any planned ad-hoc meeting/session related to this topic in
Hiroshima meeting?
Well, ROLL and 6lowpan are relevant.
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki and specifically http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/BifIETF76
has a BOF
Sorry if I misunderstand something,
but I thought it was already working.
e.g. chinese hackers successfully proofed they can switch off all
power companies in Australia whenever they want.
I remember some places in the world have forbidden to connect
lethal devices like powerplants to the
Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2009-10-06 10:20, Richard Shockey wrote:
The Utility Industry does not understand the current IPv4 number exhaust
problem ...
Ironic, really, since IP addresses for every streetlight was one of
the favourite examples in the IPng days.
+1
EPRI was an active
The general internet community needs to be aware of activities in North
America that directly relate to the use of IETF protocols in the Electric
Utility industry. This activity is generally referred to as the SmartGrid.
Though the issues immediately deal with technical and policy decisions in
Thanks. You already know this, as does Russ Housley, but I'll say it
out loud for others to hear.
At the third NIST workshop on the Smart Grid, which was the week
following the IETF meeting, several IETFers were invited by David Su
of NIST to a workshop on the role of the Internet
Myself and others are deeply concerned by how this effort is developing.
There is no current consensus on what the communications architecture of the
SmartGrid is or how IP actually fits into it.
The Utility Industry does not understand the current IPv4 number exhaust
problem and the
It will certainly get their attention ... :-)
-Original Message-
From: Michael Dillon [mailto:wavetos...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 05, 2009 5:54 PM
To: Richard Shockey
Cc: ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: The IETF and the SmartGrid
Myself and others are deeply
Hi Fred and Michael,
This is Hiroshi Esaki of WIDE project, Japan.
We have long time worked on the introduction of IP technology into the
faculity networks, especially focusing on the usage of IPv6.
We run the Green University of Tokyo Project.
We have some professional operation using IPv6 on
; Richard Shockey; ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: The IETF and the SmartGrid
Hi Fred and Michael,
This is Hiroshi Esaki of WIDE project, Japan.
We have long time worked on the introduction of IP technology into the
faculity networks, especially focusing on the usage of IPv6.
We run
On 2009-10-06 10:20, Richard Shockey wrote:
...
The Utility Industry does not understand the current IPv4 number exhaust
problem and the consequences of that if they want to put a IP address on
every Utility Meter in North America.
Ironic, really, since IP addresses for every streetlight was
13 matches
Mail list logo
