On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker hal...@gmail.comwrote:
Looking at the extreme breach of trust by US govt re PRISM, I think it is
time to do something we should have done decades ago but were stopped at US
Govt request.
Lets kill all support for X.400 mail.
Actually,
Looking at the extreme breach of trust by US govt re PRISM, I think it is
time to do something we should have done decades ago but were stopped at US
Govt request.
Lets kill all support for X.400 mail.
This is still in use, I know. But looking through the PKIX spec the schema
is ten pages long.
Phillip Hallam-Baker hal...@gmail.com wrote:
Lets kill all support for X.400 mail.
+1000.
We should do this because nobody new is going to use it.
The other reasons you mentioned are just icing.
--
Michael Richardson mcr+i...@sandelman.ca, Sandelman Software Works
pgpYSfDNjZbDG.pgp
Phill,
On 09/24/2013 05:25 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
Looking at the extreme breach of trust by US govt re PRISM, I think it is
time to do something we should have done decades ago but were stopped at US
Govt request.
Lets kill all support for X.400 mail.
This is still in use, I
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 3:19 PM, Stephen Farrell
stephen.farr...@cs.tcd.iewrote:
Phill,
On 09/24/2013 05:25 PM, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote:
Looking at the extreme breach of trust by US govt re PRISM, I think it is
time to do something we should have done decades ago but were stopped at
