Cullen Jennings wrote:
If you want my opinion on who raised the bar, it was the
participants of the IETF that wrote many BCPs that they
expected future RFCs to be compliant with.
+1.
Another good example is when an unvetted informational helper RFC
was fast tracked, becomes a central
On Sep 7, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2011-09-07 09:35, Ted Hardie wrote:
...
My personal opinion for some time has been that we ought to recognize that
the previous PS moved into WG draft years ago and that anything named an
RFC should be recognized as something that
On Sep 7, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2011-09-07 09:35, Ted Hardie wrote:
...
My personal opinion for some time has been that we ought to recognize that
the previous PS moved into WG draft years ago and that anything named an
RFC should be recognized as something that
At 16:01 06-09-2011, Cullen Jennings wrote:
I don't believe the IESG raised the bar, I think the community
raised it in a series of IETF Last Calls. And I think this is good -
if this document were lowing the PS bar from what it is today, I'd
be strongly objecting to it. The problem in my mind
On 2011-09-07 09:35, Ted Hardie wrote:
...
My personal opinion for some time has been that we ought to recognize that
the previous PS moved into WG draft years ago and that anything named an
RFC should be recognized as something that market will consider a standard.
And who raised the bar? It
On 2011-09-07 00:01, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2011-09-07 09:35, Ted Hardie wrote:
...
My personal opinion for some time has been that we ought to recognize that
the previous PS moved into WG draft years ago and that anything named an
RFC should be recognized as something that market will
On Sep 6, 2011, at 6:01 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2011-09-07 09:35, Ted Hardie wrote:
...
My personal opinion for some time has been that we ought to recognize that
the previous PS moved into WG draft years ago and that anything named an
RFC should be recognized as something that
On Tue Sep 6 23:01:12 2011, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2011-09-07 09:35, Ted Hardie wrote:
...
My personal opinion for some time has been that we ought to
recognize that
the previous PS moved into WG draft years ago and that anything
named an
RFC should be recognized as something that
On Sep 6, 2011, at 4:01 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2011-09-07 09:35, Ted Hardie wrote:
...
My personal opinion for some time has been that we ought to recognize that
the previous PS moved into WG draft years ago and that anything named an
RFC should be recognized as something that
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:12 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.dewrote:
On 2011-09-07 00:01, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
On 2011-09-07 09:35, Ted Hardie wrote:
...
My personal opinion for some time has been that we ought to recognize
that
the previous PS moved into WG draft years ago and
10 matches
Mail list logo
