[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:25 PM
Subject: Re: anyone remember when the root servers were hi-jacked? (fwd)
Michael,
Thursday, October 31, 2002, 6:28:08 PM, you wrote:
Michael http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/icann
: Re: anyone remember when the root servers were hi-jacked? (fwd)
Michael,
Thursday, October 31, 2002, 6:28:08 PM, you wrote:
Michael http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/icann-body.htm#B170
Michael tells the story as best I could reconstruct it. There are
footnotes
- Original Message -
From: Joe Baptista [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Daniel Pelstring [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 03, 2002 9:49 PM
Subject: IS THERE A CONTACT LIST OF ROOT SERVER OPERATORS - was Re: anyone
remember when the root servers were hi-jacked? (fwd)
Does
]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
% Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:25 PM
% Subject: Re: anyone remember when the root servers were hi-jacked? (fwd)
%
%
% Michael,
%
%
% Thursday, October 31, 2002, 6:28:08 PM, you wrote:
% Michael http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/icann-body.htm#B170
Michael,
Thursday, October 31, 2002, 6:28:08 PM, you wrote:
Michael http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/icann-body.htm#B170
Michael tells the story as best I could reconstruct it. There are footnotes to
Michael the documents I could find.
Notice that Professor Froomkin's To his
[EMAIL PROTECTED] would be a fine place to discuss this
further, as it is (by definition) about (albeit recent) Internet history ;-)
Joe
Craig Simon wrote:
I've got a lot of information on this which I'd be happy to share and
exchange, but I still need and want more details. I'm not sure the
That included concern over the possibility that NSI would go rogue.
NSI *did* go rogue. They're still levying a toll on much of the net.
What ended up becoming ICANN was originally an attempt to keep NSI in
check - too bad it's mostly turned out to be ineffective.
If there was a mistake
I'm looking for sources of information on the hi-jacking of the usg root
servers by Postel, Gilmore and Vixie.
Anyone remember this? It was on Jan 27 1998 when postel convenced a
number of the root operators to switch the primary from a root to f root
(paul vixie). This seems to have been done
http://www.law.miami.edu/~froomkin/articles/icann-body.htm#B170
tells the story as best I could reconstruct it. There are footnotes to
the documents I could find.
On Thu, 31 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking for sources of information on the hi-jacking of the usg root
servers
I've got a lot of information on this which I'd be happy to share and
exchange, but I still need and want more details. I'm not sure the IETF
list is the best place to discuss this matter, however, and if anyone
can suggest an alternative site, I'd gladly participate there.
Please be aware
Craig Simon wrote:
I've got a lot of information on this which I'd be happy to share and
exchange, but I still need and want more details. I'm not sure the IETF
list is the best place to discuss this matter, however, and if anyone
can suggest an alternative site, I'd gladly participate
11 matches
Mail list logo
