...
[gwz]
(I wonder how much the costs would go down if the meeting ended at 4PM
Thursday
instead of noon on Friday, and there was only one plenary night on
Wednesday.)
[gwz]
[gwz] Probably not at all. I only have experience with sponsoring one IETF,
but in that case ( I believe generally) the
Gray
Principal Engineer
Ericsson
-Original Message-
From: YAO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 07, 2007 7:03 AM
To: IETF Secretariat; ietf@ietf.org
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: joining the IETF is luxury Re: 70th IETF
Adrian Farrel wrote:
We shall see, but I don't know that putting up the price necessarily
fixes the registration income issue. You only have to deter a relatively
small proportion of attendees to wipe out the increase in charge.
I assume that the converse is also being applied: viz. cutting
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 07:03:03PM +0800,
YAO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
a message of 71 lines which said:
the price of ticket to join the IETF is not to encourage the
individual with little dollars and small company to join the IETF.
I agree.
Raising the ticket price is to raise the
See the recent email on ietf-announce:
Begin forwarded message:
From: ext Kurt Erik Lindqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: September 4, 2007 17:13:49 GMT+03:00
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: IAOC Jabberr [EMAIL PROTECTED], ietf@ietf.org, IESG \(\(E-mail\)
\) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Vancouver meeting
the early-bird
price of USD 700.00.
After Early-Bird cutoff - USD 850.00
so expensive.
joining the IETF is luxury for individual.
IETF should not take the money from the individual pocket. and should absorb
more finance support from big company
Why is it so expensive?
IETF lives in
YAO writes:
joining the IETF is luxury for individual.
[...]
it seems that IETF is becoming a wealthy club.
I agree it's a shame, but I disagree with your conclusions. The IETF
isn't a membership organization. You don't pay any dues to belong to
it, and there's no requirement to go to any
We shall see, but I don't know that putting up the price necessarily fixes
the registration income issue. You only have to deter a relatively small
proportion of attendees to wipe out the increase in charge.
I assume that the converse is also being applied: viz. cutting meeting
costs. It's
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
YAO writes:
joining the IETF is luxury for individual.
[...]
it seems that IETF is becoming a wealthy club.
I agree it's a shame, but I disagree with your conclusions. The IETF
isn't a membership organization. You don't pay any dues to belong to
On Sep 7, 2007, at 12:09 PM, Glen Zorn wrote:
...
[gwz]
(I wonder how much the costs would go down if the meeting ended at 4PM
Thursday
instead of noon on Friday, and there was only one plenary night on
Wednesday.)
[gwz]
[gwz] Probably not at all. I only have experience with sponsoring
one
*
* The official business of the IETF is still conducted -- for free and
* without discrimination -- on open mailing lists. I hope it always
* remains that way.
*
Unfortuantley, a lot of experience in the Internet community has shown
us that it is very difficult to reach actual
Adrian Farrel wrote:
We shall see, but I don't know that putting up the price
necessarily fixes the registration income issue. You only
have to deter a relatively small proportion of attendees to
wipe out the increase in charge.
I assume that the converse is also being applied: viz.
12 matches
Mail list logo
