The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'PBB-EVPN ISID-based C-MAC-Flush'
  (draft-ietf-bess-pbb-evpn-isid-cmacflush-09.txt) as Proposed Standard

This document is the product of the BGP Enabled ServiceS Working Group.

The IESG contact persons are Jim Guichard, Andrew Alston and John Scudder.

A URL of this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bess-pbb-evpn-isid-cmacflush/




Technical Summary

   Provider Backbone Bridging (PBB) can be combined with Ethernet
   Virtual Private Networks (EVPN) to deploy Ethernet Local Area Network
   (ELAN) services in large Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS)
   networks (PBB-EVPN).  Single-Active Multi-homing and per-I-SID (per
   Service Instance Identifier) Load-Balancing can be provided to access
   devices and aggregation networks.  In order to speed up the network
   convergence in case of failures on Single-Active Multi-Homed Ethernet
   Segments, PBB-EVPN defines a flush mechanism for Customer MACs (CMAC-
   flush) that works for different Ethernet Segment Backbone MAC (BMAC)
   address allocation models.  This document complements those CMAC-
   flush procedures for cases in which no PBB-EVPN Ethernet Segments are
   defined (the attachment circuit is associated to a zero Ethernet
   Segment Identifier) and a Service Instance Identifier based (I-SID-
   based) CMAC-flush granularity is required.

Working Group Summary

   Was there anything in the WG process that is worth noting?
   For example, was there controversy about particular points 
   or were there decisions where the consensus was
   particularly rough? 

The document seemed to have broad consensus, nothing beyond that.

Document Quality

   Are there existing implementations of the protocol?  Have a 
   significant number of vendors indicated their plan to
   implement the specification?  Are there any reviewers that
   merit special mention as having done a thorough review,
   e.g., one that resulted in important changes or a
   conclusion that the document had no substantive issues?  If
   there was a MIB Doctor, Media Type, or other Expert Review,
   what was its course (briefly)?  In the case of a Media Type
   Review, on what date was the request posted?

One known implementation exists, that was disclosed during the implementation 
poll

Personnel

   The Document Shepherd for this document is Matthew Bocci. The
   Responsible Area Director is Andrew Alston.


_______________________________________________
IETF-Announce mailing list
IETF-Announce@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce

Reply via email to