A new IETF WG has been proposed in the General Area. The IESG has not made
any determination yet. The following draft charter was submitted, and is
provided for informational purposes only. Please send your comments to the
IESG mailing list (i...@ietf.org) by 2018-04-16.

In November 2016, the IETF Chair kicked off the IASA 2.0 project [1]. 
Throughout 2017 and 2018, community discussions occurred on the 
ias...@ietf.org mailing list, in two virtual workshops [2], by way of 
individual drafts [3][4][5], and at BoF sessions at IETF 98, 99, 100, 
and 101. In 2017 the IETF Chair convened a design team to evaluate 
potential legal and organizational options for the IETF's administrative 
structure. The design team examined types of organizational models and 
made initial recommendations [6] prior to IETF 100. As a result of that 
discussion, the design team working with the IETF Chair asked the 
Internet Society's tax law attorneys to outline a series of specific 
legal options [7][8][9]. These options, together with proposed elements 
of a specific organizational structure [10] were discussed at IETF 101. 
The design team's recommendation [11] and the rough consensus in the 
room as confirmed on the ias...@ietf.org list in favor of a specific 
legal option -- a limited liability corporation that is treated as a 
branch or division of ISOC for tax purposes -- is embedded in the 
charter text below.

[1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/IkZfIBfM5jSrMflbY9k4cOzK8Ps
[2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hall-iasa20-workshops-report-00
[3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-daigle-iasa-retrospective-01
[4] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arkko-ietf-iasa-thoughts-00
[5] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-arkko-ietf-finance-thoughts-00
[6] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-haberman-iasa20dt-recs-01
[7] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/XT_3vfd3OWVFCW335mRrvWuusaI/
[8] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/cPK6ei47a-VG3vERO0JqpT144uE
[9] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/iasa20/UiGdiDEXyiT1x0WM8iUkxJkq1OI
[10] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-hall-iasa2-struct-01
[11] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dt-iasa20-proposal-00

IETF Administrative Support Activity 2 (iasa2)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Current status: Proposed WG

Chairs:
  TBD

Assigned Area Director:
  Alissa Cooper <ali...@cooperw.in>

General Area Directors:
  Alissa Cooper <ali...@cooperw.in>

Mailing list:
  Address: ias...@ietf.org
  To subscribe: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/iasa20
  Archive: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/search/?email_list=iasa20

Group page: https://datatracker.ietf.org/group/iasa2/

Charter: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-iasa2/

The arrangements relating to administrative support for the IETF (referred to
as the "IETF Administrative Support Activity" (IASA) [RFC4071]) were created
more than ten years ago, when the IETF initially took charge of its own
administration.  The arrangements have served the IETF reasonably well, but
there have been considerable changes in the size and scope of the IASA work,
in the world around the IETF, and in the IETF community's own expectations
since the creation of IASA.

As documented in [draft-haberman-iasa20dt-recs], the current
administrative arrangements are facing a number of challenges. The range of
IETF administrative tasks have grown considerably; the IASA organizational
structure is not as clear, efficient, or as fully resourced as it should be;
the division of responsibilities between the IETF and ISOC continues to
evolve; expectations about transparency have changed; and the IETF faces
continued challenges related to funding IETF activities against a backdrop of
increasing costs and lack of predictability in our funding streams.

In November 2016, the IETF Chair launched a project in the community to
re-assess the IETF's administrative arrangements. Since then, the IETF
community has discussed the challenges we face, the properties we expect from
future arrangements, options for the legal structure of future arrangements,
and options for the organizational structure of future arrangements.

For legal purposes, IASA is currently organized as an activity of ISOC. Among
multiple legal structure options that were considered by the IETF community,
a new limited liability corporation (LLC) that is a disregarded entity of
ISOC (i.e., it is treated as a branch or division of ISOC for tax purposes)
will be created to house the administration of the IETF. ISOC supports this
plan.

This working group is chartered to document the normative changes to IETF
administrative structures and processes necessary to effectuate this change.
The main deliverable will be a document that obsoletes RFC 4071. The working
group will produce other supporting documents as necessary to achieve its
charter objective. In parallel, the legal documents necessary to establish
the LLC will be developed outside the working group with the support of legal
counsel. These documents will not be products of the working group, but this
working group will be the venue where these documents will be presented to
the IETF community for review and discussion before they are finalized.

Aside from instances where they presently relate to IASA, it is outside the
scope of this working group to consider any changes to anything related to
the oversight or steering of the standards process as currently conducted by
the IESG and IAB, the appeal chain, the confirming bodies for existing IETF
and IAB appointments, the IRTF, or ISOC's memberships in other organizations.

Milestones:

  Nov 2018 - Document obsoleting RFC 4071 sent to IESG

  Nov 2018 - Document obsoleting RFC 4371 sent to IESG


Reply via email to