On 2/4/23 11:40 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 11:11 AM Michael Thomas wrote:
There are architectural ramifications regardless of whether it's
mandatory or not. It would be a lot more reassuring if this were a
common and accepted practice. I don't know the
On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 11:11 AM Michael Thomas wrote:
> There are architectural ramifications regardless of whether it's mandatory
> or not. It would be a lot more reassuring if this were a common and
> accepted practice. I don't know the answer to that. If it's uncommon, there
> needs to be
On 2/4/23 12:38 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 3:26 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
I guess my concern is more along the lines of what solutions
*aren't*. There are a bunch of drafts trying to tie the envelope
to the email and I think there needs to be a meta
On 2/4/23 11:02 AM, Evan Burke wrote:
On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 10:15 AM Michael Thomas wrote:
Marketing email probably does. Whether it's spam or not is often
in the eye of the beholder.
Having spent some time in the industry, I can tell you that a
significant majority of marketing
On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 10:15 AM Michael Thomas wrote:
> Marketing email probably does. Whether it's spam or not is often in the
> eye of the beholder.
>
Having spent some time in the industry, I can tell you that a significant
majority of marketing email service providers will deliver a unique
On 2/4/23 9:20 AM, Evan Burke wrote:
On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 8:47 AM Dave Crocker wrote:
On 2/4/2023 8:41 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I've yet to see a description of the problem that's
distinguishable from a mailing list that preserves DKIM signatures.
That seems like an
On February 4, 2023 5:20:27 PM UTC, Evan Burke wrote:
>On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 8:47 AM Dave Crocker wrote:
>
>> On 2/4/2023 8:41 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> > I've yet to see a description of the problem that's distinguishable from
>> a mailing list that preserves DKIM signatures.
>>
>> That
On Sat, Feb 4, 2023 at 8:47 AM Dave Crocker wrote:
> On 2/4/2023 8:41 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > I've yet to see a description of the problem that's distinguishable from
> a mailing list that preserves DKIM signatures.
>
> That seems like an especially healthy discussion to have. Focusing
On 2/4/2023 8:41 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
I've yet to see a description of the problem that's distinguishable from a
mailing list that preserves DKIM signatures.
That seems like an especially healthy discussion to have. Focusing on,
and seeking convergence about, the nature of the
On February 4, 2023 8:38:46 AM UTC, "Murray S. Kucherawy"
wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 3:26 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
>
>> I guess my concern is more along the lines of what solutions *aren't*.
>> There are a bunch of drafts trying to tie the envelope to the email and I
>> think there needs
On Thu, Feb 2, 2023 at 3:26 PM Michael Thomas wrote:
> I guess my concern is more along the lines of what solutions *aren't*.
> There are a bunch of drafts trying to tie the envelope to the email and I
> think there needs to be a meta discussion of whether that is a good idea or
> not in
11 matches
Mail list logo
