Re: [Ietf-dkim] Moving forward - from the chairs

My suggestion - and always happy to be overruled - is close the call Friday the 14th which will be 10 days. I feel it seems best to be patient. Also, does it make sense for the chairs to summarize the comments made during the call? We could do this (and by "we" I mean "me", if Laura would double

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Moving forward - from the chairs

> On 10 Apr 2023, at 19:38, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:24 AM Scott Kitterman > wrote: >> On Monday, April 10, 2023 2:05:28 PM EDT Laura Atkins wrote: >> ... >> > There is currently an active Call for Adoption for a draft. >> ...

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Moving forward - from the chairs

When chairs trigger a state change, you can set "Expected weeks in state" but it is usually left blank. Tim Has pushed all the datatracker buttons On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 2:40 PM Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:24 AM Scott Kitterman > wrote: > >> On Monday, April 10,

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Moving forward - from the chairs

On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 11:24 AM Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Monday, April 10, 2023 2:05:28 PM EDT Laura Atkins wrote: > ... > > There is currently an active Call for Adoption for a draft. > ... > > What's the plan for closing this out? I haven't seen any objections to > the > idea and as of

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Moving forward - from the chairs

Normally calls for adoptions are two weeks, and while we have had some strong discussions, I would rather not close it out early and have anyone speak ill. But Barry's comments about the document being a starting point should hold true for everyone. tim On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 2:24 PM Scott

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Moving forward - from the chairs

On Monday, April 10, 2023 2:05:28 PM EDT Laura Atkins wrote: ... > There is currently an active Call for Adoption for a draft. ... What's the plan for closing this out? I haven't seen any objections to the idea and as of tomorrow it will have been over a week since the formal call for

[Ietf-dkim] Moving forward - from the chairs

Hello, all === From Laura Thank you for your patience with getting this working group off the ground. As Murray said I am a new chair and I am still learning IETF processes. When Murray asked if I would chair the group, I agreed but requested an experienced IETF chair to co-chair the group

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Call for adoption

+1 from me too. Ken. On Tue, Apr 4, 2023, 16:50 Laura Atkins wrote: > I want to thank everyone for their patience as I learn IETF processes and > tools. Tim and I are working on a statement for the group from us as > chairs. While we’re doing that, though, I would like to get the group >