On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 9:29 AM Emanuel Schorsch wrote:
> Still, knowing that he's a bad actor, you could skip signing. Are there
>> so
>> many new spammers every day? Or, rather, there is a bunch of
>> professional
>> spammers who know how to hide?
>>
>
> Just to answer the second question:
> On 15 Aug 2023, at 17:39, Dave Crocker wrote:
>
> On 8/15/2023 9:32 AM, Jim Fenton wrote:
>> That isn’t quite fair. We thought about replay quite a bit, and didn’t see a
>> viable way of addressing it. Your comment makes it sound like we didn’t care.
>
> To be a bit more thorough, my
On 8/15/2023 9:32 AM, Jim Fenton wrote:
That isn’t quite fair. We thought about replay quite a bit, and didn’t see a
viable way of addressing it. Your comment makes it sound like we didn’t care.
To be a bit more thorough, my recollection is that we also did not
expect it to be a serious
> On 15 Aug 2023, at 17:32, Jim Fenton wrote:
>
> On 15 Aug 2023, at 5:59, Laura Atkins wrote:
>
>> But the reality is: bad-actors are going to get through every process. If we
>> could ID spammers up front and stop them from spamming we’d very likely have
>> done it already. In this case,
On 15 Aug 2023, at 5:59, Laura Atkins wrote:
> But the reality is: bad-actors are going to get through every process. If we
> could ID spammers up front and stop them from spamming we’d very likely have
> done it already. In this case, they’re using DKIM in a way that was forseen
> by the
> On 15 Aug 2023, at 12:36, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>
> On Tue 15/Aug/2023 08:10:23 +0200 Bron Gondwana wrote:
>> "Problem solved."
>> As someone who has, as a person running a service with a large number of
>> customers who can send email, ...
>> If you can provide me an accurate
On Tue 15/Aug/2023 08:10:23 +0200 Bron Gondwana wrote:
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023, at 15:50, Michael Thomas wrote:
Barry Leiba Tue, 01 August 2023 18:40 UTC
I do think the background is important to publish separately for this
work, however easy the problem is to describe.
It's because "replay"
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023, at 15:50, Michael Thomas wrote:
> Barry Leiba Tue, 01 August 2023 18:40 UTC
>
> As someone who has, as an AD, questioned the publication of such
> background documents, even in working groups I chartered, I can give a
> related opinion about this one:
>
> I do think the
