On 5/10/2024 2:33 PM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 5/10/2024 10:54 AM, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
* Prior to accepting any Standards Track document for development,
there must
be a commitment to implement the resulting proposed standard from at
least
two independent parties, as recorded on a related
On 19/05/2024 17:26, Wei Chuang wrote:
then rewrite the Content-type header mime
delimitter
Seems like including this header in the signed set would be
Best Practice?
--
Cheers,
Jeremy
___
Ietf-dkim mailing list -- ietf-dkim@ietf.org
To unsubscribe
It appears that Dave Crocker said:
>What I am suggesting is /first/ getting a substantial base of industry
>agreement, through collective action and field practice, and /then/
>codifying it with an update specification.
>
>The specification through the IETF would then merely document a new
>e
It appears that Steve Atkins said:
>> Do people really think that senders that are ignoring Sec. 8.2 of RFC 6376
>> are going to pay attention to a separate RFC
>that updates that RFC?
>
>+1. Senders, no.
Honestly, I don't know. Of the trickle of mail I see with l=, most is
from the libertarian
On 5/19/2024 9:26 AM, Wei Chuang wrote:
Dave Crocker mentioned that there is a pathway to do a narrow update
to the RFC6376 as an individual submission. I agree that it is a good
idea as hopefully a narrow update can be done relatively quickly.
What I am suggesting is /first/ getting a subs
> On 19 May 2024, at 17:32, Jim Fenton wrote:
>
> [adding the mailmaint mailing list]
>
>
> On 19 May 2024, at 9:26, Wei Chuang wrote:
>
>> Hi DKIM folks,
>> As many of you know there was a DKIM security vulnerability disclosure
>> Friday around the signature header body length tag "l=".
>
[adding the mailmaint mailing list]
On 19 May 2024, at 9:26, Wei Chuang wrote:
> Hi DKIM folks,
> As many of you know there was a DKIM security vulnerability disclosure
> Friday around the signature header body length tag "l=". The blog post is
> here: https://www.zone.eu/blog/2024/05/17/bimi-an
Hi DKIM folks,
As many of you know there was a DKIM security vulnerability disclosure
Friday around the signature header body length tag "l=". The blog post is
here: https://www.zone.eu/blog/2024/05/17/bimi-and-dmarc-cant-save-you/
The authors state that an adversary can append a malicious footer t
