Re: [Ietf-dkim] Security indicators, not Headers that should not be automatically oversigned

2024-02-06 Thread Dave Crocker
On 2/6/2024 10:43 AM, John Levine wrote: In this case, Dave's right. Wow.  Can't help yourself, can you?  "In this case." As ad hominems go, that was almost creative. But alas, it was offset by being so thoroughly gratuitous. d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Security indicators, not Headers that should not be automatically oversigned

2024-02-06 Thread Hector Santos
The "Report as Spam” button is always there. They have normalized the practice for users to expect legitimate mail in spam boxes, thus causing more eyeballs around the junk. That is all spammers want.

Re: [Ietf-dkim] Security indicators, not Headers that should not be automatically oversigned

2024-02-06 Thread John Levine
It appears that Jim Fenton said: >On 5 Feb 2024, at 14:02, Dave Crocker wrote: > >> On 2/5/2024 1:56 PM, Jim Fenton wrote: >>> And you will also provide citations to refereed research about what you >>> just asserted as well, yes? >> >> >> Ahh, you want me to prove the negative. That's not