Re: [ietf-dkim] Are arbitrary From addresses in the physical world following DKIM?

On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Dave CROCKER d...@dcrocker.net wrote: On 12/8/2010 8:36 PM, Mark Delany wrote: Forgive me for a bit of an aside, sortof. A lot of people have long used the Postal Service analogy of being able to supply an arbitrary return address as a justification for

[ietf-dkim] Are arbitrary From addresses in the physical world following DKIM?

Forgive me for a bit of an aside, sortof. A lot of people have long used the Postal Service analogy of being able to supply an arbitrary return address as a justification for doing the same in email (DC I'm looking at you, buddy). So did anyone catch the news today that UPS.com are planning to

Re: [ietf-dkim] Are arbitrary From addresses in the physical world following DKIM?

On 12/8/2010 8:36 PM, Mark Delany wrote: Forgive me for a bit of an aside, sortof. A lot of people have long used the Postal Service analogy of being able to supply an arbitrary return address as a justification for doing the same in email (DC I'm looking at you, buddy). So did anyone

Re: [ietf-dkim] Are arbitrary From addresses in the physical world following DKIM?

Mark Delany wrote: Forgive me for a bit of an aside, sortof. A lot of people have long used the Postal Service analogy of being able to supply an arbitrary return address as a justification for doing the same in email (DC I'm looking at you, buddy). So did anyone catch the news today