Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: 4871bis - section 5.4/5.5 clarify 5322.From requirement

2010-10-18 Thread Charles Lindsey
On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 05:09:53 +0100, Hector Santos hsan...@isdg.net wrote: This probably means that it should clarified what that 5.4 sentence means and also the next section 5.5 5.5. Recommended Signature Content .. The following header fields SHOULD be included in the signature,

Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: 4871bis - section 5.4/5.5 clarify 5322.From requirement

2010-10-18 Thread Hector Santos
Charles, I was showing what already is written and suggesting that it might need clarification. Charles Lindsey wrote: On Sat, 16 Oct 2010 05:09:53 +0100, Hector Santos hsan...@isdg.net wrote: This probably means that it should clarified what that 5.4 sentence means and also the next

[ietf-dkim] Issue: 4871bis - section 5.4/5.5 clarify 5322.From requirement

2010-10-15 Thread Hector Santos
Steve Atkins wrote: Hector wrote: The spec says 5.4. Determine the Header Fields to Sign The From header field MUST be signed (that is, included in the h= tag of the resulting DKIM-Signature header field). That means to me it MUST exist to be signed. h=From for a message that