Re: [ietf-dkim] Question: ADSP DKIM=UNKNOWN and A-R reporting

2011-05-05 Thread Hector Santos
Barry Leiba wrote: >>> That's not what RFC5617 says. >> � �Meaning: �No valid Author Domain Signature was found on the message >> � � � � � � �and the published ADSP was "unknown". >> >> Can't that be read as meaning a non-Author Domain Signature was not >> expected? > > No, not at all. I can't t

Re: [ietf-dkim] Question: ADSP DKIM=UNKNOWN and A-R reporting

2011-05-05 Thread Barry Leiba
>> That's not what RFC5617 says. > >    Meaning:  No valid Author Domain Signature was found on the message >              and the published ADSP was "unknown". > > Can't that be read as meaning a non-Author Domain Signature was not > expected. No, not at all. I can't think of any interpretation

Re: [ietf-dkim] Question: ADSP DKIM=UNKNOWN and A-R reporting

2011-05-04 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On 04.05.2011 14:56, Hector Santos wrote: > Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> The only difference between setting "unsigned" and letting it be derived >> by default should be the ability to control the expiration of such >> value. > > Can you rephrase this so I can better understand your thinking? ATPS

Re: [ietf-dkim] Question: ADSP DKIM=UNKNOWN and A-R reporting

2011-05-04 Thread Hector Santos
Alessandro Vesely wrote: >> The "(unauthorized signer)" was added because it was an explicit >> DKIM=UKKNOWN DNS record declaration. >> >> If there was no ADSP record, the adsp= info would look like this: >> >> adsp=none author.d=tana.it signer.d=mipassoc.org; >> >> Would that be a reasonable v

Re: [ietf-dkim] Question: ADSP DKIM=UNKNOWN and A-R reporting

2011-05-04 Thread Alessandro Vesely
On 03.05.2011 15:28, Hector Santos wrote: > Authentication-Results: dkim.winserver.com; > dkim=pass header.i=mipassoc.org header.d=mipassoc.org header.s=k1; > adsp=fail policy=unknown author.d=tana.it signer.d=mipassoc.org > (unauthorized signer); > > The "(unauthorized signer)" was added

Re: [ietf-dkim] Question: ADSP DKIM=UNKNOWN and A-R reporting

2011-05-03 Thread Hector Santos
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote: >> For my A-R reporting if there an explicit DKIM=UNKNOWN record, I took >> this declaration to mean the domain only allows it to sign sometimes >> and no one else. > > That's not what RFC5617 says. Meaning: No valid Author Domain Signature was found on the messag

Re: [ietf-dkim] Question: ADSP DKIM=UNKNOWN and A-R reporting

2011-05-03 Thread Murray S. Kucherawy
> -Original Message- > From: ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org [mailto:ietf-dkim-boun...@mipassoc.org] > On Behalf Of Hector Santos > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2011 6:29 AM > To: ietf-dkim@mipassoc.org > Subject: [ietf-dkim] Question: ADSP DKIM=UNKNOWN and A-R reporting &g

[ietf-dkim] Question: ADSP DKIM=UNKNOWN and A-R reporting

2011-05-03 Thread Hector Santos
RFC5617 has for this tag value: dkim= Outbound Signing Practices for the domain (plain-text; REQUIRED). Possible values are as follows: unknown The domain might sign some or all email. For my A-R reporting if there an explicit DKIM=UNKNOWN record, I took this de