Charles Lindsey wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Nov 2010 02:04:16 -, Hector Santos wrote:
>
>> It is (A) that is most important here and this is where the corrective
>> text should be added. The original ISSUE Posting included proposed
>> text to follow the "last header" paragraph in Section 5.4:
>>
>>
John R. Levine wrote:
>>> Presumption of RFC5322 compliance is the mistake made in DKIM and ADSP.
>> 50% agreed. This mistake is only in DKIM, IMHO.
>
> At this point, it would be helpful if you could propose specific language
> for 4871bis. And if it's not presuming 5322 compliance, it would
