because employees, understandbly looking for the latest news, were
consuming bandwidth needed for emergency communications.
Bobby Addison
vint cerf [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 09/11/2001 06:53:29 PM
To: Franck Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ietf/istf
Eric writes:
I know of a major direct backbone connection in
a near ISP (tens of Mbps) that didn't respond anymore.
Wow ... tens of Mbps counts as major in your part of the woods?
What could have been the reason? Too much sudden traffic?
Some strategic nodes destroyed? Bad re-routing?
congestion is US. Have a look on http://www.internettrafficreport.com/
-Original Message-
From: TOMSON ERIC [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: mercredi 12 septembre 2001 9:54
To: 'Anthony Atkielski'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: ietf/istf role in US Disaster?
We've been blocked
The Internet seems to be to a near halt from
where I stand, the Pacific Islands. I think the
Internet has never seen so much overload on its US
section...
The reports I've seen indicate no significant overload overall, only an overload
on many news sites.
