Standard usage (in general, not just IDs and RFCs) is that if you're
absolutely sure that your intended audience knows what you're talking about,
you can omit the explanation, as I just did.
s/intended audience/all reasonable audiences who may need the document/
randy
I liked Tony Hain's suggestion that the future IETF terminal room/
wireless LAN ntworks should offer NATted IPv4 and plain IPv6, to
better reflect the choices available to much of the world.
i wish i could agree that they are, but the transition plan seems to
have a lot of nats in it. sigh
New ISPs have sold multihoming to customers as a way to gain market
share against incumbents whenever they could
yup. and they get the money. but, since they neglected to put paying
the rest of us in the financial model, i presume they will excuse our
not spending our critical resources to
when expected infrastructure works, we tend not to notice it. so ietf51
attendees may not notice that the net works, the wireless has been up since
friday evening, etc. along with not noticing it, we don't think of the folk
who made it work. so, if you see the folk in bt blue, gary, christian,
from the outside, it appears as if microsoft consciously decided to
distribute software with everything enabled so that their product
would be perceived as very easy to use. the problem is that this
means it is also easy to abuse. so the net is now paying for them
having a more salable product.
people who evidently live in a complete vacuum and have never heard
warnings about executable content
oh you mean 98% of microsoft's customer base. yup, that's they. and ms
loves to sell to the naive.
randy
it may come down to whether or not one believes in gun control. 99% of net
users are innocent children. should we ship guns that are loaded and with
the safeties off?
randy
procmail is your friend
# thanks to Sematimba Noah K [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
*^Content-type: (multipart/mixed|application/octet-stream)
{
:0 HB
*^Content-Disposition:
attachment;.*filename=.*\.(bat|com|exe|vbs|chm|hlp|shs|wsf|vbe|wsh|hta|pif)
{
:0 fhbw
|/usr/bin/sed -e
seems like SOAP's first problem is layering on top of HTTP .
not a necessity, just blinders of that community, a limitation derived from
understanding only layer seven.
randy
in case you are having trouble with medium price hotels in london, from a
friend, philip hazel, coming down from cambridge:
---
Incidentally, I found a suitable 3-star hotel in London for only GBP 55
per night.
wow! how far from paddington, where i gather we will be?
Couple of blocks.
I'm aware of that, but only one machine in the world can have a given IP
address, and only one machine can have a given FQDN.
both assertions are false
plonk!
Absolute bullshit on both quotes. Sometimes lies become truths
for those who believe hard and see that king is infact well dressed
rather than naked.
Sure, the quotes sound sweet and beckon the revolutionary on.
But please spare us the propaganda or what you'd like to refer to as the
13 matches
Mail list logo
