Hi Nikos,
I think that's a very interesting idea. Like you, I also think we probably
underestimate the extent to which data minimisation and anonymisation
techniques genuinely obscure personal data. And yet very often, they are the
only answers to the question What is 'Privacy By Design?'...
not sure if the required action here is further research work
or changes to the draft, but I do think the problem would benefit from being
explored and defined more fully…
HTH,
Robin
Robin Wilton
Technical Outreach Director - Identity and Privacy
Internet Society
email: wil...@isoc.org
Phone: +44
That works for me… it's compatible with further discussion that doesn't result
in changes to the draft's scope of contents.
R
Robin Wilton
Technical Outreach Director - Identity and Privacy
Internet Society
email: wil...@isoc.org
Phone: +44 705 005 2931
Twitter: @futureidentity
On 10 Aug
Absolutely
Robin Wilton
Technical Outreach Director - Identity and Privacy
Internet Society
email: wil...@isoc.org
Phone: +44 705 005 2931
Twitter: @futureidentity
On 10 Sep 2012, at 11:58, Bryan McLaughlin (brmclaug) wrote:
HI Robin,
I agree it is ’blurry’
My point was that we
Excellent - thanks Jeff. Just leaving for SFO to present a paper on Ethical
Data Handling.
R
Sent from my iPod
On 14 May 2014, at 15:59, =JeffH jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com wrote:
And, building upon Solove's work, there's this...
Big Data Ethics
Apologies for top-posting, but this is a general reply rather than
point-by-point responses…
It feels like a possible goal, then, is a short piece of text which contains
sufficient “hooks” to link to other material (which in turn can define specific
aspects of the problem in appropriately
Thanks Peter,
very useful.
I think the underlying “meta”-issue here is emerging…
If we assume that you can start with a “high-level” definition that needs to be
applied and interpreted by “lower-level” descriptions and guidance, and that it
is theoretically possible to acheve the desired level
