Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
Given that the all-tzdata-as-a-software-update mechanism is already
available, I sort of assumed that this draft was intended for systems
that don't already have such a mechanism.
My impression is that the tzdist protocol is also intended to supplement those
On 31/01/15 08:15, Paul Eggert wrote:
Consider an internet-connected bedside alarm clock
Given your comments, I'd think that any such alarm clock should get the
entire tz database, just as an OS update would. This would preserve
privacy better than having the alarm clock query only about
Lester Caine wrote:
some devices such as central heating controllers
would not need a processor capable of the sort of processing power
needed to handle that
Even the lowliest central heating controller can easily handle the entire tz
database, if only to discard unneeded parts as they're
Hi Daniel,
Thanks again for this review.
I think there are several categories of issues that you've raised, and
I'd like to break them out. The first is the easy category: that which
has been raised before and considered. There is only one issue in that
category as to whether or not everything
