I agree with your approach. However, if it should be tested by
community and reported successful then why we need to go through 5
years, just publish fast ways,
AB
Sun, 27 Jan 2013 20:27:17 -0800
If this is an experiment, then you presumably answers to the following
questions:
On 01/28/2013 04:27 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
About the idea of an experiment:
Right. The context being its an RFC 3933 IETF process
experiment.
On 1/25/2013 5:07 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
Responses to some points below but I'd really like to ask
people to consider a few things here:
-
On 1/28/2013 3:12 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
On 01/28/2013 04:27 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
...
If this is an experiment, then you presumably answers to the following
questions:
1- what is your an hypothesis?
2- what you intend to measure?
3- what is your 'control' against which
Apologies for responding to recent comments in random order: I'm
travelling and have accumulated something of a backlog.
no worries :)
thx again for your thoughts.
BenL replied:
On 22 January 2013 03:11, =JeffH jeff.hod...@kingsmountain.com wrote:
snip
- is there a
standard reference
My read of this draft is that it eliminates the need for rough consensus at
both the WG and IETF level. Basically the WG chair can just decide and even if
the WG disagrees with the chair. If the WG does not have consensus in WGLC that
they they do want to publish the draft, it still gets
The IESG has received a request from the Multiprotocol Label Switching WG
(mpls) to consider the following document:
- 'MPLS-TP Applicability; Use Cases and Design'
draft-ietf-mpls-tp-use-cases-and-design-06.txt as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and
The IESG has received a request from the Forwarding and Control Element
Separation WG (forces) to consider the following document:
- 'ForCES Logical Function Block (LFB) Library'
draft-ietf-forces-lfb-lib-10.txt as Proposed Standard
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and
The IESG has approved the following document:
- 'A Uniform Resource Name (URN) Namespace for the Open IPTV Forum
(OIPF)'
(draft-higgs-oipf-urn-00.txt) as Informational RFC
This document has been reviewed in the IETF but is not the product of an
IETF Working Group.
The IESG contact person is
The IESG has received a request from the Open Shortest Path First IGP WG
(ospf) to consider the following document:
- 'OSPF Stub Router Advertisement'
draft-ietf-ospf-rfc3137bis-03.txt as Informational RFC
The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits
final comments on
The IESG has completed a review of draft-boucadair-mmusic-altc-08
consistent with RFC5742.
The IESG has no problem with the publication of 'Session Description
Protocol (SDP) Alternate Connectivity (ALTC) Attribute'
draft-boucadair-mmusic-altc-08.txt as an Informational RFC.
The IESG has
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6850
Title: Definitions of Managed Objects for
Routing Bridges (RBridges)
Author: A. Rijhsinghani, K. Zebrose
Status: Standards Track
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6851
Title: Internet Message Access Protocol (IMAP)
- MOVE Extension
Author: A. Gulbrandsen, N. Freed, Ed.
Status: Standards Track
Stream:
A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
RFC 6867
Title: An Internet Key Exchange Protocol
Version 2 (IKEv2) Extension to Support
EAP Re-authentication Protocol (ERP)
Author: Y. Nir,
The 2012-2013 IETF Nominating Committee (Nomcom) requests your
urgent assistance. The Nomcom is seeking nominations for the position of
Transport Area Director, to broaden our pool of candidates. Please
nominate individuals for this position by sending email to
nomco...@ietf.org, or use the
The 2012-2013 IETF Nominating committee (Nomcom) is pleased to
announce the selection of seven IESG members whose two year terms
start at IETF 86 in March 2013.
The Nomcom continues its work to fill the position of Transport Area
Director. Please see the accompanying announcement regarding
15 matches
Mail list logo