> not the one patent examiner that seems to have missed the
> existence of engineering libraries in his or her undergraduate
> education.
That's a bold presumption, and even though i don't know any of those guys whom
you put the blame upon, i'd rather think that you're trying to come up with
a mu
> The problem is that a patent provides a presumption of validity. Thus,
> even if the patent ignores prior non-patent art, the creator of that
> prior (published) art has to spend time and money defending himself in
> court. Ultimately, that favors the big corporation with a standing army
> of la
obal/news/pr/archives/month/2013/20130129-02.html
>
> That gets me worried about folks might try to "fix" the internet
> mostly due to the fact that they really haven't understood what
> is already there any why.
>
> -Martin
--
---
Toerless Eckert, eck...@cisco.com
Cisco NSSTG Systems & Technology Architecture
SDN: Let me play with the network, mommy!
On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 07:52:56AM +, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> On Mar 4, 2013, at 19:44, Michael Richardson wrote:
> > The Transport Area has all of the groups that deal with transport
> > protocols that need to do congestion control. Further, the (current)
> > split of work means that all of t
+1 +1 +1
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 08:24:58PM +, Scott Brim wrote:
> On 03/03/13 15:14, "Michael Richardson" allegedly
> wrote:
> >To be considered qualified the candidate needed to:
> > a) have demonstrated subject matter expertise (congestion in this case)
>
> (I just want to nit on this: I
On Sun, Mar 03, 2013 at 03:55:39PM +, Eggert, Lars wrote:
> only if the Y directorate reviews all IDs going through the IESG. Which in
> itself is a scaling issue. It may work for some topics, but things will fall
> through the cracks for various reasons.
>
> IMO congestion control is impor
12, but the IESG will
> look at this in 2013, and that's where a highly educated decision has to be
> made.)
>
> Grüße, Carsten
>
--
---
Toerless Eckert, eck...@cisco.com
Cisco NSSTG Systems & Technology Architecture
SDN: Let me play with the network, mommy!
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 09:47:38AM +0100, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> On Mar 7, 2013, at 07:55, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>
> > Really ? You don't think a good AD should primarily look for factual
> > evidence
> > (lab, simulation, interop, ..) results produc
> PS.: I just spent a day at CeBIT. One guy there reported to that he has seen
> 35000 active devices on his WiFi snooper.
> I'm not quite sure what that means, but he seemed to be implying "at a
> specific point in time".
> Go congestion control that. And then "prove" that your solution works.
rom both the IESG and the
> community) to fill the open TSV AD position this year?
>
> I would like to know the purpose of the meeting, because I believe it would
> be appropriate for me to participate in a discussion of the former topic, but
> not the latter.
>
> Margaret
>
>
>
>
>
--
---
Toerless Eckert, eck...@cisco.com
Cisco NSSTG Systems & Technology Architecture
SDN: Let me play with the network, mommy!
:gs/nomcom/nomcom process/
On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 10:40:32AM -0800, David Kessens wrote:
>
> Sam,
>
> On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 01:32:59PM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> >
> > I don't think there is hair splitting going on here; I think the issues
> > that are being raised are quite real and import
On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 07:01:00AM -0800, S Moonesamy wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> At 06:48 08-03-2013, t.p. wrote:
> >How (apart from posting to this list)?
>
> Talk to the individuals who are part of NomCom 2012. It's easier to
> discuss face to face. There is also an email address (
> nomcom-ch...@ie
> current text as /not/ assigning the authority to the Nomcom. It's fine
> that other read it differently, but that's not the point.
>
> It should require really creative mis-reading to get an interpretation
> that differs from everyone else.
>
> d/
> --
>
Thanks, David. Good insight for the community.
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 04:41:43PM -0400, David Harrington wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Many suggestions have been made about ways to resolve the issue of finding
> suitable candidates for TSV Area Director, or adjusting the job to fit
> available candidates.
>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:59:34PM -0400, Jeffrey Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:13:01PM -0400, Sam Hartman wrote:
> > Part of what I meant when I signed the diversity letter was to state a
> > belief
> > that within a pool of qualified candidates, I believe diversity is
> > important en
gt;
> > The IAOC would like to hear from the community on this proposal. It plans
> > to
> > make a decision on its 18 April call in order to make the changes in time
> > for the
> > Berlin registration and will consider all input received by 17 April.
> >
like the ones i asked for, then the effort will just
reinforce bogus statistical claims.
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 01:33:21PM -0300, Arturo Servin wrote:
>
> On 4/11/13 1:00 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> > if you do add questions about diversity, please also add
> > the f
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 12:58:07PM -0400, Thomas D. Nadeau wrote:
> questions must be optional to answer too.
Definitely.
> Tom
>
>
> On Apr 11, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
>
> > When adding diversity questions to the registration form, i think there
58 PM, Thomas D. Nadeau wrote:
> > questions must be optional to answer too.
> >
> > Tom
> >
> >
> > On Apr 11, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Toerless Eckert wrote:
> >
> >> When adding diversity questions to the registration form, i think there
> >> shoul
; participants? That's a point worth studying, but wouldn't likely be
> addressed by the proposed survey, unless some way were added to include
> non-attending participants.
>
--
---
Toerless Eckert, eck...@cisco.com
Cisco NSSTG Systems & Technology Architecture
SDN: Let me play with the network, mommy!
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 04:40:57PM -0800, Melinda Shore wrote:
> My own feeling is that if we were to find that the
> numbers supported the notion that there's bias
> present in the system we probably couldn't do anything
> about it without tearing the organization apart, so,
> we live with bias, a
A question because my institutional memory does reach as far back:
How much was Europe represented over the decades in IETF leadership ?
Right now for example IESG seems to have maybe at least 5
europeans (don't really know how to figure out location for all of them,
those where just the easy one
rgument just
> because it is labeled as an appeal. Sometimes legitimate differences of
> opinion are just that, and consensus was rough.
>
> Jari
>
--
---
Toerless Eckert, eck...@cisco.com
It's much easier to have an opinion if you do not understand the problem.
Not sure why rfc1981 PMTUD was never fixed. I've repeatedly tried to
suggest to just forget about PMTUD for IP multicast, and i have never
come across a good use case to justify MTU > 1280 for IP multicast
across the Internet.
We did manage to get section 11.1 into rfc 3542 though. It's a little
b
24 matches
Mail list logo
