On Fri, 20 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
So what then for future meetings?
Will they let us play alongside for free if we promise to be v6 only?g
On the other hand imagine wireless-free WG sessions!g
I would imagine that the IETF as _customers of the hotel_ can do pretty
much
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It sort of had to start happening. Marriott apparently aims to provide
wireless access at 400 hotels in Germany, the U.K. and the U.S.
FWIW, wireless access != being on the Internet
Many places use NATs and/or firewalls, or require registered MAC
addresses (some
Pekka Savola wrote:
I would imagine that the IETF as _customers of the hotel_ can do pretty
much what it wants.
Depends on Marriott's contract with Wayport--it probably specifies some
degree of exclusivity. But Wayport might be happy to grant an exception
when they learn the volume of
John Stracke wrote:
Pekka Savola wrote:
I would imagine that the IETF as _customers of the hotel_ can do
pretty much what it wants.
Depends on Marriott's contract with Wayport--it probably specifies some
degree of exclusivity. But Wayport might be happy to grant an exception
when they
Marriott's announcement was that they had signed an agreement with
T-Mobile to provide the 802.11b network services. This is the same
company that provides the services at Starbucks in the U.S. My personal
opinion is that the service is pretty poor.
The available subscription plans are
Folks, the Secretariat is quite good at this stuff. Really.
The odds that they are going to book us into a hotel where we
can't work effectively --especially along a dimension as easily
understood as this one-- are, I think (reinforced by all of our
experience since Houston), low enough that
John C Klensin wrote:
Folks, the Secretariat is quite good at this stuff.
No argument there. :-)
--
/=\
|John Stracke |[EMAIL PROTECTED] |
|Principal Engineer|http://www.centive.com|
