HI Mark,
> Any thoughts and opinions would be greatly appreciated as this relates
> directly to corrections suggested to be made to my PhD thesis!
This is going to re-iterate most of what Bruce said, but since you asked:
> 1)Does the equation for bond distance resolution (r = pi/2deltak) only a
On Wednesday 06 June 2007, MarkBondin wrote:
> 2) What is the actual equation which defines the determinacy of a fitting
> procedure and does this differ between SS and MS analyses? For MS analyses
> there has been a recently published equation (Coord. Chem. Rev. 2005, 249,
> 141-160) which takes i
Codruta - it's better off if you have someone walk you through this type of
analysis for the very first time, as it is somewhat involved. You may decide
to come to one of the short courses (the nearest ones will be at the APS in
the end of July, and the NSLS in October - the dates are still being
f
I have been, working with a bimetallic Co/Cr catalyst supported on a silica
template for synthesis of single wall carbon nanotubes. Recently I have
performed some analysis at the NSLS. It is clear from the spectra in R space
that the interatomic distances are modified compared to the monometallic
c
On Wednesday 06 June 2007, MarkBondin wrote:
> 1)Does the equation for bond distance resolution (r = pi/2deltak) only
> apply to SS? I have held the opinion that this can be applied to MS
> analysis however I have recently been informed that this equation does not
> correctly describe distance reso
Hi, I would like general opinions of some EXAFS practioners in regards to the
most widely accepted methods for bond distance resolution and correlation of
parameters in both single scattering (SS) and multiple scattering (MS) EXAFS
refinements and if these can be said to differ?
1)Does the equa
