[Ifeffit] Brainteaser

2008-04-03 Thread Anatoly Frenkel
Attached is a brainteaser which I think is cute. Too late for the April fool's day but still... Some comments: three consecutive scans of the same sample were taken in this order: scan 1, 2 and 3. Duration: 30 minutes per scan. If these data look unusual to you please tell us why and what

Re: [Ifeffit] Brainteaser

2008-04-03 Thread Matthew Marcus
MessageThe most obvious explanation for why the post-edge scans line up and the pre-edges don't is that the transmission chamber current amp or V/F is saturated and reads a fixed value below the edge. As the ring current decays, I0 goes down while It is fixed below the edge, so ln(I0/It)

Re: [Ifeffit] Brainteaser

2008-04-03 Thread Anatoly Frenkel
I apologize to everyone who Matthew did not even give a chance to think but the excuse is that Matthew is really good! It was a saturation of the I_t current amplifier. Another sign of that is too sharp a rise of the edge right after the pre-edge - it is when the I_t signal drops below the

[Ifeffit] FW: Brainteaser

2008-04-03 Thread Anatoly Frenkel
-Original Message- From: Matthew Marcus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2008 9:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] Brainteaser Sorry about jumping in too quickly. I've had this very thing happen to me so I recognize the sharp edge rise. Maybe I