Scott,
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Scott Calvin
dr.scott.cal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Brandon,
Matt and Bruce both gave good, thorough answers to your questions this
morning. Nevertheless, I'm going to chime in too, because there are some
aspects of this issue I'd like to put emphasis on.
Matt,On May 13, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Matt Newville wrote:After all, the epsilon shouldbe different for differentk-ranges, as your signal to noise ratio probably changes as a function of k.Using the same epsilon doesn't reflect that.Without seeing the data in question, this seems like speculation
Hi Scott,
Sorry, I read epsilon as noise in chi(k). This is the most
meaningful physical/statistical measure: epsilon_r surely depends on
k-weight and can depend on k-range as it samples different portions of
the spectra. Like you say, it will tend to increase as you increase
the k-range.
On
Hi George,
thanks for responding. I sure imported the same structural information
into atoms and the crystal structure program.
Lisa
Hi Lisa,
I'm not very familiar with PbSO4, so I'm not sure if I can help, but
your
email immediately brought some questions to mind.
First, did you
