Hi Hashem,
I doubt they're artifacts. Much more likely is that they are either
due to multiple-scattering paths, or to sidebands of the single-
scatterers.
During analysis, you don't want to think of the Fourier transform as
being literally a radial distribution function; i.e., features in
Hi Hashem
You can copy-paste the respective EXAFS data in Athena and compare the
backtransforms over the first shell, the first+second shell, the second shell.
By comparison of the backtransforms with each other and with the measured
EXAFS, you can see where the second-shell contribution has
Hi Hashem,
I show one method for doing this in my book chapter Figure 14-23 on page 431.
(I feel a bit like a broken record). I will send you a copy if you want.
Shelly
-Original Message-
From: ifeffit-boun...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov [mailto:ifeffit-
