Matt,
At the risk of coming off sounding a bit mean, I don't think you are
asking a very well-posed question.
Examining the history of this project, I see that you are fitting in q
space. Like Matt, this is not my favorite choice, but there is
nothing horribly wrong about it, so long as you
Matt,
Outside of the question of fitting the data, can you collect absorption data on
the additional 3+ metal you are adding the material?
Chris
***
Dr. Christopher Patridge
Assistant Professor
Department of Math and Natural Sciences
D'youville
First, a disclaimer--I haven't looked at the data Matt sent (it's a busy time
of year!), but I disagree in a general sense with my reading of what Bruce
wrote (perhaps I am reading it wrong). In particular, I disagree with this
statement:
Given that you are fitting in q-space, it is
On 12/05/2013 12:18 PM, Scott Calvin wrote:
While I defend that principle as a very important one, I'm not
claiming it applies in Matt's case--it probably doesn't. To reproduce
features at high-R, it IS necessary to have a model (i.e. paths) that
cover the high-R contribution, and it sounds like
Bruce,
Without those friendly warnings (reminders), beginners would likely fall down
several rabbit holes before understanding many of the important steps necessary
to get meaningful answers in EXAFS.
I know I would have.
Chris
***
Dr. Christopher
Besides, that's a (very common) misuse of the word hosanna.
-Original Message-
From: ifeffit-boun...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
[mailto:ifeffit-boun...@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Anatoly I
Frenkel
Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2013 12:29 PM
To: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit
I object the use of hosannas of adoration. Other than the use of Greek
mythology, I propose the mailing list to be religion-neutral and tautology-free.
How about you should consider praise or adoration, instead of you should
consider hosannas of gratitude.
Anatoly
Scott,
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Scott Calvin scal...@sarahlawrence.edu wrote:
First, a disclaimer--I haven't looked at the data Matt sent (it's a busy time
of year!), but I disagree in a general sense with my reading of what Bruce
wrote (perhaps I am reading it wrong). In particular,
What I find reassuring about Bruce's warnings is they allow you to think
properly about what you are doing. Fortunately, unlike Chris, I am not of a
size where I have to worry about falling down rabbit holes, unless American
rabbits are much bigger than English ones.
I would commend Matt's
Hi Anatoly,
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Anatoly I Frenkel afren...@yu.edu wrote:
I object the use of hosannas of adoration. Other than the use of Greek
mythology, I propose the mailing list to be religion-neutral and
tautology-free.
Is Down the rabbit hole OK? I'm not sure it usually
It must be a slow day in the EXAFS world. Does the term 'topic drift' mean
anything? :-)
The Wikipedia entry http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hosanna has some examples of
secular use of the word, FWIW, which I admit isn't much.
mam
On 12/5/2013 2:02 PM, Matt Newville wrote:
Hi Anatoly,
I love the warnings Artemis gives! They're not just for novices--they often
catch when I've made a dumb mistake somewhere. I praise them, defend them, and
generally think Bruce has done a wonderful thing by having them.
The out of range default warning, however, I find counterproductive and
Hi Scott,
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Scott Calvin scal...@sarahlawrence.edu wrote:
I love the warnings Artemis gives! They're not just for novices--they often
catch when I've made a dumb mistake somewhere. I praise them, defend them,
and generally think Bruce has done a wonderful thing
13 matches
Mail list logo
