Re: [Ifeffit] Ifeffit Digest, Vol 166, Issue 12

2016-12-16 Thread Bruce Ravel
On 12/16/2016 12:55 PM, Raj kumar wrote: Thanks for the explanation. Yes, both files are generating the same kind of output but the positioning of atoms can mislead in the context of structure. That's why i have raised the question. Hi Raj, But they are /the/ /same/ structure, so they give the

Re: [Ifeffit] Ifeffit Digest, Vol 166, Issue 12

2016-12-16 Thread Raj kumar
rmore, all atoms (except few) are represented with three coordinated > position for Demeter generated file instead of two coordinated position. > > I already posted this query in the ifeffit mailing domain but the message > was not get circulated. Hence, I writing this problem to

Re: [Ifeffit] Web Atoms 1.8 vs Demeter 0.9.26: feff output are not same

2016-12-16 Thread Bruce Ravel
On 12/16/2016 10:34 AM, Raj kumar wrote: Recently, i found out that feff.inp generated by web atoms and Demeter 0.9.26 are not the same. My main worry is in the position of atoms. For evidence, i am attaching YbVO4 (*feff.inp*) files generated by both web atoms and Demeter. With this kind of zirc

[Ifeffit] Web Atoms 1.8 vs Demeter 0.9.26: feff output are not same

2016-12-16 Thread Raj kumar
Dear All, Recently, i found out that feff.inp generated by web atoms and Demeter 0.9.26 are not the same. My main worry is in the position of atoms. For evidence, i am attaching YbVO4 (*feff.inp*) files generated by both web atoms and Demeter. With this kind of zircon type structure, one would exc