Hi Melike,
If the 'before doping' system is a known material - i.e. a bulk standard
- I would fix N's, let R's, sig^2's, dEo, and So^2 be variables to fit.
While sig^2 may be similar between doped and undoped, I would not assume
that no disorder has been introduced on doping. I would consider
Dear all,
For a reliable comparison of two EXAFS data sets (lets say before and after
Cu-doping), which parameters should be kept consant in the first model?
I understand that sigma^2 values should be the same in two fittings, and I
would see a change in coordination numbers and deltaE0 and delt
