Re: [Ifeffit] Conduction band energy and deltae0

2022-03-12 Thread Robert Gordon

Hi Melike,

If the 'before doping' system is a known material - i.e. a bulk standard 
- I would fix N's, let R's, sig^2's, dEo, and So^2 be variables to fit. 
While sig^2 may be similar between doped and undoped, I would not assume 
that no disorder has been introduced on doping. I would consider 
transferring So^2 from undoped standard to doped (assuming you are 
fitting the same edge in both cases. You will have correlation between N 
and sig^2 as well as between R and dEo.


dEo represents an offset correction to the Fermi level (model 
calculation vs actual) but also corrects for where Eo is chosen when 
extracting the EXAFS. A change in dEo could be due to a change in model 
validity (i.e. model being used is less accurate for doped than for 
standard undoped). Uncertainty in the fit value of dEo will likely be a 
substantial fraction of dEo, so small changes may not be statistically 
significant.


For comparing the two data sets, start with the visual...XANES, chi(k) 
(maybe k^2*chi(k) or another k-weighting) and
the FT(k^2*chi(k)). That can help guide your interpretation of fit 
results - if you see differences in low k but not high
k for example, or if your first shell looks broader but lower in 
amplitude in the doped vs undoped potentially indicating some splitting 
of nn distances (but then this may manifest as an increase in sig^2 if 
you don't have data to high enough k to resolve a small splitting).


Rather generic advice...hope it helps...

cheers,
-R.






On 2022-03-10 4:04 a.m., Melike Babucci wrote:


Dear all,

For a reliable comparison of two EXAFS data sets (lets say before and 
after Cu-doping), which parameters should be kept consant in the first 
model?


I understand that sigma^2 values should be the same in two fittings, 
and I would see a change in coordination numbers and deltaE0 and 
deltar after Cu doping. Is that a good approach?


Does the new deltaE0 indicate a change in the conduction band energy?

Thanks in advance.

Best regards,

Melike

Page Title







När du har kontakt med oss på Uppsala universitet med e-post så 
innebär det att vi behandlar dina personuppgifter. För att läsa mer om 
hur vi gör det kan du läsa här: 
http://www.uu.se/om-uu/dataskydd-personuppgifter/


E-mailing Uppsala University means that we will process your personal 
data. For more information on how this is performed, please read here: 
http://www.uu.se/en/about-uu/data-protection-policy


___
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Unsubscribe:http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit
___
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit


[Ifeffit] Conduction band energy and deltae0

2022-03-12 Thread Melike Babucci
Dear all,

For a reliable comparison of two EXAFS data sets (lets say before and after 
Cu-doping), which parameters should be kept consant in the first model?
I understand that sigma^2 values should be the same in two fittings, and I 
would see a change in coordination numbers and deltaE0 and deltar after Cu 
doping. Is that a good approach?
Does the new deltaE0 indicate a change in the conduction band energy?

Thanks in advance.
Best regards,
Melike









N?r du har kontakt med oss p? Uppsala universitet med e-post s? inneb?r det att 
vi behandlar dina personuppgifter. F?r att l?sa mer om hur vi g?r det kan du 
l?sa h?r: http://www.uu.se/om-uu/dataskydd-personuppgifter/

E-mailing Uppsala University means that we will process your personal data. For 
more information on how this is performed, please read here: 
http://www.uu.se/en/about-uu/data-protection-policy
___
Ifeffit mailing list
Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov
http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
Unsubscribe: http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/options/ifeffit