Hi Damdin,
Matt and Shelly have answered this very well, but I have one more
thought to add.
You have a mineralogical sample and apparently have a pretty good idea
what the mineral is, since you're not varying r or n. Under those
circumstances, you probably have a hypothesis as to the struc
Damdin,
An XAFS book or theory that says "S02 must be between 0.8 and 1"
overstates the case.
In simplest terms, S02 is a fudge factor. There is a theoretical
basis for it (passive electron overlap), but much of this can also be
folded into other "loss terms" that are due to inelastic scattering
8:19 AM
> To: 'ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov'
> Subject: [Ifeffit] About S02
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am graduate student and doing EXAFS in my research.
>
> My question is about S02. From the XAFS books or theory it says that
this
> value must be between 0
Hello everyone,
I am graduate student and doing EXAFS in my research.
My question is about S02. From the XAFS books or theory it says that this value
must be between 0.8 to 1, but in the literature some people used different
values like 0.25 or 1.4. In my case I fitted experimental RDF of my s
