Hi Edmund and Chris:
I totally agree but for the same reason as Edmund, it is much more
efficient to let the monochromator and not stop and start all the time.
Rebinning is useful if you are sure that it works properly.
Carlo
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018, Edmund Welter wrote:
Dear Chris,
Dear Chris,
Rebinning is always fraught; I would normally not allow a student to
do it...
I thought you would say that! ;-) and I share your concern, actually
that is the reason why we store ~8600 data points or more for a scan of
1200 eV. Don't mess with the raw data! But 8600 (or
Dear all
Rebinning is always fraught; I would normally not allow a student to do it...
You might be interested in our paper [Schalken, M et al., JSR, 2018] which
explicitly avoids rebinning and propagates uncertainty to ifeffit-like [Matt
modified] analysis, efeffit.
This was an outcome
