Hello again, I removed the artemis projects and the autosave file from C:\Program Files\Ifeffit\horae\stash\. The problem still presists. Everytime the window opens to either save a project or open a new data set Artemis crashes. Is there anything else I can do?
Sincerely, Sergio Sanchez ---- Original message ---- >Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 12:00:01 -0500 >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Ifeffit Digest, Vol 54, Issue 5 >To: ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov > >Send Ifeffit mailing list submissions to > ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Ifeffit digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: problems in the current version of Artemis for Windows > ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 2. EXAFS Divination Set results ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > 3. xanes feff8 sulfur ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 21:50:30 -0400 (EDT) >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Ifeffit] problems in the current version of Artemis for > Windows >To: "XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit" <ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > >Hi Bruce (and others, if the spam filter lets this through), > >At 10:36 AM 8/1/2007, you wrote: > > >1. The most serious bug is a scenario where Artemis simply hangs when > you start it. > In the current version, there is bug in the place where Artemis > checks for abandoned projects, resulting in the behavior described > above. For now, the work-around is to close the Artemis console > window then, using your file manager, look at this folder: > C:\Program Files\Ifeffit\horae\stash\ > In that folder you should find several folders with names like > artemis.project.0 > artemis.project.1 > and so on. Toss each of those folders into the recycling bin and > try starting Artemis. It should work now. > >I've found that I also have to remove the artemis.autosave file or it >still won't work. Rather than putting it in the recycle bin, I put it in >another folder, and then have Artemis open it as if it were a regular >project. Voila! I can still recover the project... > >--Scott Calvin >Sarah Lawrence College > > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 22:00:56 -0400 (EDT) >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Ifeffit] EXAFS Divination Set results >To: "XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit" <ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov> >Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > >Hi all, > >I thought you might want to know about the first results from the "EXAFS >Divination Set" project I've been plugging. I don't think the results will >be any surprised to the veterans on this list, but might give novices an >idea of what's possible. > >To briefly recap, my students made up mixtures of various iron compounds >in various proportions, and then I analyzed them "blind." The idea was to >see how well XAFS analysis as practiced by an "expert'" can do in that >kind of case. Unfortunately, unbeknownst to me, the standards were poorly >prepped (i.e. they were very uneven). So these results show what can be >done with poor samples. I'm planning a follow-up for this fall using an >entirely new set of samples and standards prepped as carefully as we can. >Presumably better samples will generate more accurate results. >Nonetheless, it's nice to know what can be done under conditions that are >far from ideal. > >The first two samples I analyzed were mixtures of known compounds in >unknown amounts (iron and hematite in one case; iron, goethite, and >humboltine in the other). My analysis gave the correct percent composition >to within 15 percentage points in all cases. > >The next four samples were mixtures of two or three compounds from a list >(iron, hematite, goethite, humboltine, FeO, lepidocrocite, and magnetite). >I didn't know which compounds were chosen, whether there were two or >three, and how much of each. In two of the four cases I correctly >identified the compounds present. In one case I identified two of the >three compounds, and noted that there might be a third present in a small >concentration but that I couldn't confirm that; the three compounds proved >to be present. In the last case I correctly identified the majority >compound but misidentified the minor contributor. In three cases I found >the correct percent compositions to within 10 percentage points; the last >was off badly. > >The next three samples involved a compound completely unknown to me mixed >with one or two compounds known to me. I correctly identified the class of >the completely unknown compound. In two cases the percent compositions I >found were correct within 10 percentage points; the other within 16. > >The last sample was a mixture of the complete unknown with one or two >compounds chosen from the list, but without me knowing which ones. As >already indicated, I correctly identified the class of the complete >unknown. I also identified one of the two other compounds as definitely >present and the other as most likely if there were a third compound >involved. Percent compositions for this sample were not accurate. > >You could therefore argue that this shows that bad data yields bad >results. But I'd tend to look at it another way--even questionable data >can yield pretty good results. In all cases but one the substances were >correctly identified (twice provisionally as a possible minor >contributor), despite the fact that many of the candidate substances are >structurally similar in that they involve octahedrally coordinated iron. >Percent compositions were usually good rough guides, although on occasion >they went astray. > >I'll leave these data up at > >http://xafs.org/EXAFS_Divination_Set > >and let you know when I get the high-quality follow-up project posted... > >--Scott Calvin >Sarah Lawrence College > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 3 >Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:00:19 +0200 (CEST) >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [Ifeffit] xanes feff8 sulfur >To: ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov >Message-ID: > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > >Hello! > >Does anybody know a person, who has experience respective the topics >xanes+feff8 and sulfur K-Edges? >I would be very thankful for an answer :-) > >sincerely yours, >Eckhard Bosman > > >--------------------------------- >Eckhard Bosman >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >+49 (0)551-39-14441 >Raum: E0.104 >Institut f?r R?ntgenphysik >Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1 >37077 G?ttingen >Germany > > > >------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >Ifeffit mailing list >Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov >http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit > > >End of Ifeffit Digest, Vol 54, Issue 5 >************************************** _______________________________________________ Ifeffit mailing list Ifeffit@millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov http://millenia.cars.aps.anl.gov/mailman/listinfo/ifeffit
