Re: [Ifeffit] LCF on Larch - EXAFS Region

2018-08-14 Thread Matt Newville
Hi Martin and Mike, Thanks -- I'll take a closer look at your paper on this! I think we all basically agree that linear analysis of EXAFS can work, but also that compared to linear analysis of XANES, linear analysis of EXAFS has a few more caveats and issues that need to be addressed for each ca

Re: [Ifeffit] LCF on Larch - EXAFS Region

2018-08-13 Thread Martin McBriarty
Matt, Glad to read your impressions of EXAFS LCF. I've had reasonable success with LCF using EXAFS spectra generated by ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) to figure out the local structure of dopants whose preferred coordination is symmetrically dissimilar from the crystals they inhabit, i.e. for

Re: [Ifeffit] LCF on Larch - EXAFS Region

2018-08-12 Thread Mike Massey
Hi Matt, Thanks for your thoughts. In general, I agree with all of your points, but my typical uncertainty estimate for both XANES and EXAFS LCF is much greater than a few percent. Typically I quote 10-15% uncertainty, depending on the analysis. I particularly agree with your point regarding d

Re: [Ifeffit] LCF on Larch - EXAFS Region

2018-08-12 Thread Matt Newville
Hi Mike, On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 10:04 PM Mike Massey wrote: > This is interesting. Could you say more about your skepticism of the > robustness of EXAFS LCF, Matt? > > To be fair, it suffers from many of the same drawbacks of XANES LCF, plus > others. But I'm curious about your thoughts on it si

Re: [Ifeffit] LCF on Larch - EXAFS Region

2018-08-09 Thread Garret Bland
Thanks for the reply Matt! I mostly do linear combinations in the XANES region as well, but with Hg, I also do first derivative of XANES and EXAFS regions to confirm my fits. Garret On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 3:57 PM Matt Newville wrote: > Hi Garret, > > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:27 PM Garret Bland

Re: [Ifeffit] LCF on Larch - EXAFS Region

2018-08-09 Thread Mike Massey
This is interesting. Could you say more about your skepticism of the robustness of EXAFS LCF, Matt? To be fair, it suffers from many of the same drawbacks of XANES LCF, plus others. But I'm curious about your thoughts on it since yours seems to be what amounts to a "strong opinion" on the subje

Re: [Ifeffit] LCF on Larch - EXAFS Region

2018-08-09 Thread Matt Newville
Hi Garret, On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 12:27 PM Garret Bland wrote: > Hello! > > I've recently been trying to use Larch instead of Athena for EXAFS > analysis, and I mainly do linear combination fitting for my samples. It > seems that the XANES fitting is doing just fine requesting a specified > regi

[Ifeffit] LCF on Larch - EXAFS Region

2018-08-09 Thread Garret Bland
Hello! I've recently been trying to use Larch instead of Athena for EXAFS analysis, and I mainly do linear combination fitting for my samples. It seems that the XANES fitting is doing just fine requesting a specified region to fit (-25 to +75 eV). When I try to fit in the k-space however, Larch do