l <bra...@bnl.gov>
보낸 날짜: 2015년 9월 1일 화요일 오전 3:52
받는 사람: XAFS Analysis using Ifeffit
제목: Re: [Ifeffit] Spline range and FT range
Hi Kug-Seung,
I was at the XAFS conference last week, as were a bunch of the other
folks who might answer a question like this. Guanghui pointed you at
the Athena user
Hi Kug-Seung,
I was at the XAFS conference last week, as were a bunch of the other
folks who might answer a question like this. Guanghui pointed you at
the Athena user guide, which will help to some extent with your
questions.
On 08/25/2015 08:20 AM, 이국승(에너지환경소재연구팀) wrote:
While I was
Hi everyone,
While I was processing my data, I found that the FT features are changing as I
change the spline range.
I think the change is severe as my data contain a lot of noises at high-k
regions (above 12k).
The change is remarkable even when FT range is fixed and even when the spline
Wei,
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Wei Li we...@udel.edu wrote:
Dear all,
I am wondering about what range should be chosen in Athena? Some
literature
says from 1 to the end; some says from 0.5 to the end.
What literature says this? Do you mean to imply that someone is saying it
should be
Dear all,
I am wondering about what range should be chosen in Athena? Some literature
says from 1 to the end; some says from 0.5 to the end.
Wei
--
Wei Li
Postdoc researcher
Environmental Soil Chemistry Group
Delaware Environmental Institute
University of Delaware, Newark,19713
Dear Wei,
the answer should be - resonable... Everything depends on the data
quality, definition of the edge and energy. You have to keep in mind
that this subtracts EXAFS oscillations from EXAFS experimental data. So
in general, spline line should follow the atomic absorption
kicaj
W dniu
Wei,
You may not have looked at it yet, but the chapter draft I sent to you has
several pages devoted to the topic.
--Scott Calvin
Sarah Lawrence College
On Sep 18, 2011, at 10:10 AM, Wei Li wrote:
Dear all,
I am wondering about what range should be chosen in Athena? Some literature
says
