Re: [Ifeffit] [Ext] Dumb question

2023-02-17 Thread Robert Gordon
OK...my first impulse would be to plot the full unnormalised XANES on the same graph so you can see the features grow in or change. If there are a large number of scans, maybe only plot every 3rd or 4th or such. You might find a better point to examine for time dependence than the one you had

Re: [Ifeffit] [Ext] Dumb question

2023-02-17 Thread Roberta Candela
Yes I think that would be the plot. I currently haven’t been normalizing anything as I was just trying to see if I could get a rough draft. I haven’t done any background removal it was essentially just the raw data. As far as the features go I am not sure? I wasn’t trying to target a specific

Re: [Ifeffit] [Ext] Dumb question

2023-02-16 Thread Robert Gordon
So your goal is to plot If/I0 versus time for a given energy in the XANES. Are you exporting normalised XANES or just If/I0? Are you doing background removal from the pre-edge? Is another feature underlying this targeted feature also disappearing or changing? i.e. you are not watching a feature

Re: [Ifeffit] [Ext] Dumb question

2023-02-16 Thread Roberta Candela
Ha no worries! It would be Ifinal over time (to my vague understanding). I’m trying to show that the sample was saturated by looking above the fluorescence k-alpha line (or I guess it’s called the white line?) because the intensity should increase and then level off once it’s saturated. This is

Re: [Ifeffit] [Ext] Dumb question

2023-02-16 Thread Carlo Segre
Hi Robert: What, exactly are you interested in plotting? It is not quite clear from your message. Is it the Io as a function of time during a scan? Is it the XANES scans as a function of time for a reaction? Carlo On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:59 AM Roberta Candela wrote: > Hi all, I am