[Ilugc] Re: Canonical Not Great Contributor

2008-09-29 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Mon, Sep 29 2008, Venkatraman S wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:00 AM, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >>What is the point of having testers when the benefit is not >> passed on upstream to benefit everyone? That is the critical point in >> Greg's talk. Ubuntu efforts

Re: [Ilugc] Re: Canonical Not Great Contributor

2008-09-29 Thread Venkatraman S
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 8:59 AM, Parthan SR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > >> > LOL. Am sure you haven't done enough homework to know about the one you're > throwing that question at. To let you know of the fact, Manoj contributes to > Ubuntu's upstream named Debian and hence not only Ubuntu but a

Re: [Ilugc] Re: Canonical Not Great Contributor

2008-09-29 Thread Parthan SR
Venkatraman S wrote: Now am sure a lightning is gonna strike you and you gonna become green as a toad!! Have you contributed to Ubuntu? or aware of the development/bug-reporting process in Ubuntu? LOL. Am sure you haven't done enough homework to know about the one you're throwing that questio

Re: [Ilugc] Re: Canonical Not Great Contributor

2008-09-29 Thread Kapil Hari Paranjape
Hello, On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Venkatraman S wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:00 AM, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > Ubuntu efforts benefit Ubuntu. They are not close source, > > but unlike the rest of the free software world, they make no effort to > > feed any changes back upstr

Re: [Ilugc] Re: Canonical Not Great Contributor

2008-09-29 Thread Kumar Appaiah
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 06:39:59AM +0530, Venkatraman S wrote: > Have you contributed to Ubuntu? or aware of the development/bug-reporting > process in Ubuntu? > If not, then let me summarize for you : It clearly says that a bug found in > upstream can either be fixed by the developer or be passed

Re: [Ilugc] Re: Canonical Not Great Contributor

2008-09-29 Thread Praveen A
2008/9/29 Sri Ramadoss M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > It gave the chance of Live CD for > some one who is scared that trying GNU/ Linux distros will crash > their Hard disks This is one of the examples of not giving credit to others for their contributions and think Ubuntu did everything in one day. Li

Re: [Ilugc] Re: Canonical Not Great Contributor

2008-09-29 Thread Venkatraman S
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 4:00 AM, Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >What is the point of having testers when the benefit is not > passed on upstream to benefit everyone? That is the critical point in > Greg's talk. Ubuntu efforts benefit Ubuntu. They are not close source, > but

[Ilugc] Re: Canonical Not Great Contributor

2008-09-29 Thread Manoj Srivastava
On Sun, Sep 28 2008, Satish Chandra wrote: > On Sun, Sep 28, 2008 at 7:29 AM, Swapnil Bhartiya > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > Even though Ubuntu doesn't contribute development wise, they have an > important contribution - a large user base who can serve as testers. I > myself am not much knowle

Re: [Ilugc] Re: Canonical Not Great Contributor

2008-09-29 Thread Aanjhan R
On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:23 AM, Parthan SR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (obviously) in the restricted section. I do not have too much gyan on this, > but happen to read this in the response mdz made for Greg's presentation. For people who are wondering what or who this mdz is. Here goes the link.

Re: [Ilugc] Re: Canonical Not Great Contributor

2008-09-28 Thread Parthan SR
Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: the question is this: 1. Ubuntu has patched the kernel, the patch is available in their repositories under GPL and there is nothing to prevent the maintainers of the kernel from pulling in the patches [From Ubuntu Forums, on a similar question about finding Ubuntu sp

Re: [Ilugc] Re: Canonical Not Great Contributor

2008-09-28 Thread Sri Ramadoss M
Ubuntu install is six easy steps. It gave the chance of Live CD for some one who is scared that trying GNU/ Linux distros will crash their Hard disks Ubuntu comes with one GUI and doesn't confuse a new bie with all that is available. It is a success from a user's perspective and that is all it i

Re: [Ilugc] Re: Canonical Not Great Contributor

2008-09-28 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On Monday 29 Sep 2008 9:53:45 am p.sriram wrote: > Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I have a confession to make: I have shamelessly used linux since 1995 and > > have never contributed a patch to the kernel. Even worse, I dont know C. > > So, boycott me. Hate me. Kick me. Ban me. >

[Ilugc] Re: Canonical Not Great Contributor

2008-09-28 Thread p . sriram
Kapil Hari Paranjape <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > P. S. Even Newton, Faraday and Einstein were wrong at times! for an example google for einstein's airfoil design, which he worked on around the time of world war 1. decades later, einstein wrote about how embarassed he was about this work. srir

[Ilugc] Re: Canonical Not Great Contributor

2008-09-28 Thread p . sriram
Swapnil Bhartiya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I just learnt from a friend of mine that I should stop using Ubuntu as > Canonical is not contributing to the > development of GNU/Linux systems as compared to other players. by this logic, what happens to distributions like centos? sriram _

[Ilugc] Re: Canonical Not Great Contributor

2008-09-28 Thread p . sriram
Kenneth Gonsalves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I have a confession to make: I have shamelessly used linux since 1995 and > have never contributed a patch to the kernel. Even worse, I dont know C. So, > boycott me. Hate me. Kick me. Ban me. your offer is acceptable. but, wait. we can do all that