Re: [Ilugc] [OT] [[Need help]] Few *nix questions

2016-02-23 Thread Bala Kumar
Hi, --- On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:22 PM, sahil wrote: | Thanks. I appreciate. | But I lost the charm of asking questions at least on this forum. > > \-- Appreciate your interest and thanks for sharing those questions. Will help if you can highlight your

Re: [Ilugc] [OT] [[Need help]] Few *nix questions

2016-02-23 Thread sahil साहिल
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:19 PM, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > Sahil, > > --- On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:04 PM, sahil साहिल > wrote: > | No one raised concern about questions or approach. > \-- > > You received two technical replies from both Arun

Re: [Ilugc] [OT] [[Need help]] Few *nix questions

2016-02-23 Thread sahil साहिल
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Shakthi Kannan wrote: > Hi, > > --- On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Ganesh Ranganathan > wrote: > | No, it's a matter of list etiquette. There is a common language of > | communication agreed upon by the

Re: [Ilugc] [OT] [[Need help]] Few *nix questions

2016-02-23 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Sahil, --- On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:04 PM, sahil साहिल wrote: | No one raised concern about questions or approach. \-- You received two technical replies from both Arun and me. So, the above is not true.

Re: [Ilugc] [OT] [[Need help]] Few *nix questions

2016-02-23 Thread Shakthi Kannan
Hi, --- On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Ganesh Ranganathan wrote: | No, it's a matter of list etiquette. There is a common language of | communication agreed upon by the users of this mailing list and that is | English. | | "Namaste" is not Indian culture, it's

Re: [Ilugc] [OT] [[Need help]] Few *nix questions

2016-02-23 Thread sahil साहिल
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Ganesh Ranganathan < ganesh.ranganathan...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Udaya Kumar wrote: > > > > > To be frank your first response in this thread, with solution, was the > > correct response until it was spoiled by

Re: [Ilugc] [OT] [[Need help]] Few *nix questions

2016-02-23 Thread Ganesh Ranganathan
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Udaya Kumar wrote: > > To be frank your first response in this thread, with solution, was the > correct response until it was spoiled by you bringing 'Namaste' as note. > All other response are waste of resource. ​No, it's a matter of list

Re: [Ilugc] [OT] [[Need help]] Few *nix questions

2016-02-22 Thread sahil साहिल
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 12:57 PM, Udaya Kumar wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Mohan R wrote: > > > On 23-Feb-2016 10:33, "Manokaran K" wrote: > > > > > > Being a > > > group dedicated to freedom (of speech among others), I

Re: [Ilugc] [OT] [[Need help]] Few *nix questions

2016-02-22 Thread Udaya Kumar
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Mohan R wrote: > On 23-Feb-2016 10:33, "Manokaran K" wrote: > > > > Being a > > group dedicated to freedom (of speech among others), I don't think its > > right to object to anything thats not a personal attack. > +1

Re: [Ilugc] [OT] [[Need help]] Few *nix questions

2016-02-22 Thread sahil साहिल
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:57 AM, Mohan R wrote: > On 23-Feb-2016 10:33, "Manokaran K" wrote: > > > > Being a > > group dedicated to freedom (of speech among others), I don't think its > > right to object to anything thats not a personal attack. > > So

Re: [Ilugc] [OT] [[Need help]] Few *nix questions

2016-02-22 Thread Mohan R
On 23-Feb-2016 10:33, "Manokaran K" wrote: > > Being a > group dedicated to freedom (of speech among others), I don't think its > right to object to anything thats not a personal attack. So what qualifies as objectionable under freedom of speech? Anyone can vomit some shit