Re: [ilugd] How do I record LPs using a Linux Box?

2004-03-04 Thread aman rai
as i understand it, you want your LP's converted to something digital... the answer is simple... irrespective of which OS you use... what you need to do is tap into the output of the player, and put that into the Line In port of your soundcard. There are several ways of doing this. You can look fo

[ilugd] Online Programming Contest notification

2004-03-04 Thread 2k4 cyber
Hello all, We are students from Department of CSE, Thiagarajar college of Engineering, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India. We are conducting an online programming contest as part out National level technical symposium (Cyber 2004) on 7th March. We welcome people who are interested in programming to

[ilugd] Linux software + acctg proj

2004-03-04 Thread Sanjay Kumar
[Bouncing at Sanjay's request, with editing. Anyone in a position to help him out with the CDs and software he needs? -- Raju] Dear Raj Going ahead from LinuxAsia, I'm trying to set up some demo Linux at a client's office in Rajasthan and need to get some software - details below. (There's a Li

[ilugd] RE: [LIH]Fastest method of installation

2004-03-04 Thread Giri, Ravi A
:: -Original Message- :: From: Yashpal Nagar :: criteria for choosing best interms of fast data transfer / :: reliability & easyiness or lesser work to perform ,over the :: network of (10 Mb/s) FTP will probably be the fastest considering just the protocol, but you might find NFS the b

[ilugd] [Weird] Postgresql vs Oracle

2004-03-04 Thread vivek khurana
Hi! Everyone This is a slightly weird question. I am having this debate with a friend of mine. We can't reach conclusion so i am bring it to this platform Q Which is a better DB for serving enterprise needs Postgresql or Oracle (comaprision in terms of support, cost, platform independence, dep

RE: [ilugd] Re: facing problem in putting a kernel module

2004-03-04 Thread manoj.thakkar
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Samveen Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 10:48 AM To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list Subject: [ilugd] Re: facing problem in putting a kernel module On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 Tarun Dua wrote : >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

[ilugd] Re: facing problem in putting a kernel module

2004-03-04 Thread Samveen
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 Tarun Dua wrote : >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Bu whn I run make then it says printk not found and all > > Looks like some kernel header files are missing > > Is there anybody who has tried and know how to make it to work > > >From your Makefile > > INCLUDE:=-isystem /lib

[ilugd] (fwd) Re: ILUG-D: Contact Us

2004-03-04 Thread Raj Mathur
[Forwarding without prejudice -- Raju] This is an RFC 1153 digest. (1 message) -- Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Nishikant Kapoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: Raj Mathur <[EMAIL

[ilugd] (fwd) Abobe Reader 5.1 XFDF Buffer Overflow Vulnerability

2004-03-04 Thread Raj Mathur
[Please upgrade if you use Adobe Acrobat Reader -- Raju] This is an RFC 1153 digest. (1 message) -- MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Cont

[ilugd] (fwd) GNU Anubis buffer overflows and format string bugs

2004-03-04 Thread Raj Mathur
[Please upgrade if you use GNU Anubis. Binary-encoded exploit snipped -- Raju] This is an RFC 1153 digest. (1 message) -- Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: Ulf =?iso-8859-1?b?SORybmhhbW1hcg==?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: [E

[ilugd] (fwd) [SECURITY] [DSA 455-1] New libxml packages fix arbitrary code execution

2004-03-04 Thread Raj Mathur
[Please upgrade if you have libxml or libxml2 installed -- Raju] This is an RFC 1153 digest. (1 message) -- Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Schulze) To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SECURITY] [DSA 4

[ilugd] Re: facing problem in putting a kernel module

2004-03-04 Thread Tarun Dua
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Bu whn I run make then it says printk not found and all > Looks like some kernel header files are missing > Is there anybody who has tried and know how to make it to work >From your Makefile > INCLUDE:=-isystem /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include Does this direc

Re: [ilugd] facing problem in putting a kernel module

2004-03-04 Thread Samveen
>Hi I am a newbie to kernel module programming me too <;-) >here is the makefile >CFLAGS := -O2 -DMODULE -D__KERNEL__ ${WARN} ${INCLUDE} add '-c' to this line as you want an elf object file not an elf executable. >${TARGET}.o: ${TARGET}.c alternately change above to /* use (GCC) not {GCC} (better

[ilugd] facing problem in putting a kernel module

2004-03-04 Thread manoj.thakkar
Hi I am a newbie to kernel module programming I have just written a code as follows Bu whn I run make then it says printk not found and all Looks like some kernel header files are missing Is there anybody who has tried and know how to make it to work /* hello-2.c - Demonstrating the module

RE: [ilugd] Re: strcpy & local variable in c

2004-03-04 Thread D.Venkatasubramanian, Noida
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] lhi.org]On > Behalf Of Vikas Upadhyay > Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 2:41 PM > To: The Linux-Delhi mailing list > Subject: Re: [ilugd] Re: strcpy & local variable in c -- snip > > Still frnds, I am not very clea

Re: [ilugd] Re: strcpy & local variable in c

2004-03-04 Thread Arindam Dey
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 16:56, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote: [snipped some excellent discourse by AMS] Thank you very much for clearing that up. I was pretty mistaken about the stack and heap thing. I had totally forgotten about the malloc thing have been using new and delete for quite a while now :-).

Re: [ilugd] Re: strcpy & local variable in c

2004-03-04 Thread Vikas Upadhyay
> Very true when the function returns the stack is emptied and all local > variables are deleted. But the pointer is made on the heap not the > stack!So you will have to "delete" the pointer manually. You are taking > control away from the compiler and telling it that you are implementing > it manu

Re: [ilugd] Re: tutorials on curses

2004-03-04 Thread Rahul Kumar
Hey, if you guys are interesting in snake-charmers, poisonous curses and stuff try out curses with pythons: http://www.amk.ca/python/howto/curses/ http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-python6.html?dwzone=linux I dont know what exactly our good friend wanted to do with curses, but

[ilugd] Re: strcpy & local variable in c

2004-03-04 Thread Abhijit Menon-Sen
At 2004-03-04 13:22:02 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > *No* valid assumptions can be made with respect to undefined > behaviour. You cannot even expect it to "not work." Oh, and just as an illustration of what this means, according to the C standard, the behaviour of #pragma is "implementation

[ilugd] Re: strcpy & local variable in c

2004-03-04 Thread Abhijit Menon-Sen
At 2004-03-04 16:07:16 +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Very true when the function returns the stack is emptied and all local > variables are deleted. That's not true, and it's a very misleading way of thinking about this situation. Yes, automatic variables (as C calls them) are allocated on t

Re: [ilugd] tutorials on curses

2004-03-04 Thread Raj Shekhar
harsh sharma wrote: can anyone of u please send me the usefule links or any matter related to learning curses i do not have any idea about them...so i have to start from the beginning.. Check the `/usr/share/doc/ncurses-devel-5.3/` directory. You will find enough documentation there to get y

Re: [ilugd] Re: strcpy & local variable in c

2004-03-04 Thread Arindam Dey
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 16:07, Arindam Dey wrote: > Try adding these two statements and changing your foo() function > > char * foo() > { > char string[200]; > char * ptr=NULL; > strcpy(string,"hello world"); > printf("StrAddr=%x\n",&string[0]); // Print address of th

RE: [ilugd] strcpy & local variable in c

2004-03-04 Thread D.Venkatasubramanian, Noida
Hi, Try this code. Hope you understand the difference now. Regards, Venky #include #include char * foo(); char * foo1(); int main() { char string[200]; char *p; p = foo(); foo1(); strcpy(string,p); printf("String=%s\n",string); return 0; } char * foo() { char string[200]; char * p

Re: [ilugd] Re: strcpy & local variable in c

2004-03-04 Thread Arindam Dey
On Thu, 2004-03-04 at 15:38, Vikas Upadhyay wrote: > From: "Abhijit Menon-Sen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > At 2004-03-04 12:24:25 +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > > According to me, as we have "string" as local variable, it should > vanish. > > > But, i am still able to return and print the