Niyam,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Linux Lingam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> dear all,
>
> everyone focusses on 'cheap' or 'low-cost' linux laptops, especially netbooks.
> what i'm looking for is the opposite:
> the top-most, high-end laptop in the market, that ships with gnu/linux
> pre-ins
dear all,
everyone focusses on 'cheap' or 'low-cost' linux laptops, especially netbooks.
what i'm looking for is the opposite:
the top-most, high-end laptop in the market, that ships with gnu/linux
pre-installed,
or has the market forgotten that gnu/linux is also about performance?
i don't care if
Dear Narendra,
Thanks a lot for long list of complains. :) Keep them coming. let me
respond to your points in-line.
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:11 PM, narendra sisodiya
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> @Dinesh , Better to ask, what are the problems in FOSS adaptations.
>
> Adaptation of Linux is not f
Hi,
My thoughts below:
--- On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:11 PM, narendra sisodiya
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| ### Only so called Techie students from CS use Linux.
\--
Because there is a misconception that only CS/IT have to use computers
for all their work. The division of departments in "academi
@Dinesh , Better to ask, what are the problems in FOSS adaptations.
Adaptation of Linux is not fast and not up to the expectations. My
observations are not good
1) Linux and FOSS are not much popular..
### I will love to put up posters at Nehru Place, provided somebody
volunteer for design.
#
[With the usual apology for X-Posting]
Please circulate widely
*Insignia 3.0 :Hackerdom*
A celebration of FOSS culture
The Dept.of Computer Science,Government Engineering College, Thrissur
and Free Software Users Group of Thrissur, are delighted to announce
the Annual National Event on Free Softw
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 10:50 AM, Amit Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We know that lots of corporates use Linux on their servers.
>
> Of late, due to various reasons, corporates are using Linux for desktops as
> well.
>
> Where can i get the list of such companies, in Delhi NCR, who h
List,
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Sudev Barar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/11/21 Amit Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Of late, due to various reasons, corporates are using Linux for desktops as
>> well.
>>
>> Where can i get the list of such companies, in Delhi NCR, who have migrated
>
2008/11/21 Amit Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Of late, due to various reasons, corporates are using Linux for desktops as
> well.
>
> Where can i get the list of such companies, in Delhi NCR, who have migrated
> to Linux Desktops.
You can go better by asking how many desktop users. In my group t
Hi,
We know that lots of corporates use Linux on their servers.
Of late, due to various reasons, corporates are using Linux for desktops as
well.
Where can i get the list of such companies, in Delhi NCR, who have migrated to
Linux Desktops.
regards,
amit
Add more friends to your
On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 12:17 AM, Sharad Birmiwal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A shot in the dark: BIOS have this option called something like
> "Enable USB legacy support". Having it enabled sometimes does not
Or may be it was having disabled that screwed up the booting thing.
Either ways, it's w
A shot in the dark: BIOS have this option called something like
"Enable USB legacy support". Having it enabled sometimes does not
allow you to boot into Linux (don't ask me why, this used to happen on
my old laptop). Try disabling it. It might force Linux to recognize
the port as USB 2.0?
Sharad
On Friday 21 Nov 2008, Nalin Savara wrote:
>
> What kinda comp are you using Parijat ? Is it a laptop by any chance
> ? If it's a laptop-- then often, all the USB ports are not USB-2--
> sometimes in laptops, one or more ports are USB 1 or USB 1.1 -- maybe
> it's for for older USB keyboards, mouse
Hi Parijat, Group,
Please see my reply embedded in quoted text.
>
> >>> hdparm -tT /dev/YOUR-DRIVE
> >>>
> >>
> >> /dev/sdd1:
> >> Timing cached reads: 1664 MB in 2.00 seconds = 831.30 MB/sec
> >> Timing buffered disk reads: 18 MB in 3.15 seconds = 5.72 MB/sec
>
hmmm.. even I have seen
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Sudev Barar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/11/20 Parijat Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> After mounting the disk see output of
>>> hdparm -tT /dev/YOUR-DRIVE
>>>
>>
>> /dev/sdd1:
>> Timing cached reads: 1664 MB in 2.00 seconds = 831.30 MB/sec
>> Timing buffere
2008/11/20 Parijat Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> After mounting the disk see output of
>> hdparm -tT /dev/YOUR-DRIVE
>>
>
> /dev/sdd1:
> Timing cached reads: 1664 MB in 2.00 seconds = 831.30 MB/sec
> Timing buffered disk reads: 18 MB in 3.15 seconds = 5.72 MB/sec
>
The last is not good at
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:23 AM, Sudev Barar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/11/19 Parijat Garg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > so from flash to ubuntu desktop. I suspect that the disk is being mounted
> as
> > a USB 1.1 device. The dmesg output doesn't seem to say that though.
> Inlined
> > is the dme
17 matches
Mail list logo
