Re: [ilugd] [Freed] Meeting for Freed.in discussion, 3pm, Sun., 30/12, JNU

2007-12-29 Thread Linux Lingam
dear all, [snip] > There was recently a > sprint by the django community. About a 100 people all around the > world participated. The main group was in Chicago, with other smaller > groups in other cities and many individuals sitting in their homes. > It was all done over IRC. IRC can be used in tw

Re: [ilugd] [Freed] Meeting for Freed.in discussion, 3pm, Sun., 30/12, JNU

2007-12-28 Thread Saurabh Nanda
> Please do > remember that Freed.in is what the community wants it > to be, so if you do not like the change of focus, please > be at the meeting, and make yourselves heard. This focus on "what the community wants", in my opinion, does not always work. There are things which need to be driven by

Re: [ilugd] [Freed] Meeting for Freed.in discussion, 3pm, Sun., 30/12, JNU

2007-12-28 Thread Roshan
--- "Pushp ..." wrote: [snip...] > * Sorry for wasting your precious time by > interfering in > between.Mysincere appologies to all if u find this > mail a > CRAP. You seem to have used a HTML format and set all text within your email to be bold. Kindly avoid that in future. Great to know th

Re: [ilugd] [Freed] Meeting for Freed.in discussion, 3pm, Sun., 30/12, JNU

2007-12-28 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 28-Dec-07, at 7:13 PM, Raj Mathur wrote: >>> IRC is inelegant for a participatory meet. >> >> BS - it works just fine > > Thanks for volunteering to sit in at the meet and relay messages > between > the local and the IRC participants :) Is this intended to be a joke? If so, it is in very po

Re: [ilugd] [Freed] Meeting for Freed.in discussion, 3pm, Sun., 30/12, JNU

2007-12-28 Thread Raj Mathur
On Friday 28 Dec 2007, Kenneth Gonsalves wrote: > On 28-Dec-07, at 5:34 PM, Linux Lingam wrote: > > IRC is inelegant for a participatory meet. > > BS - it works just fine Thanks for volunteering to sit in at the meet and relay messages between the local and the IRC participants :) Regards, -- R

Re: [ilugd] [Freed] Meeting for Freed.in discussion, 3pm, Sun., 30/12, JNU

2007-12-28 Thread Kenneth Gonsalves
On 28-Dec-07, at 5:34 PM, Linux Lingam wrote: > IRC is inelegant for a participatory meet. BS - it works just fine -- regards Kenneth Gonsalves Associate, NRC-FOSS [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://nrcfosshelpline.in/web/ Foss conference for the common man: http://registration.fossconf.in/web/ _

Re: [ilugd] [Freed] Meeting for Freed.in discussion, 3pm, Sun., 30/12, JNU

2007-12-28 Thread Linux Lingam
On Dec 28, 2007 2:16 PM, Gora Mohanty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 13:49 +0530, Pradeepto Bhattacharya wrote: > [...] > > I am wondering if it will be possible to participate via > > IRC. That would be great though. > [...] > > We can certainly try that, though it ha

Re: [ilugd] [Freed] Meeting for Freed.in discussion, 3pm, Sun., 30/12, JNU

2007-12-28 Thread Gora Mohanty
On Fri, 2007-12-28 at 13:49 +0530, Pradeepto Bhattacharya wrote: [...] > I am wondering if it will be possible to participate via > IRC. That would be great though. [...] We can certainly try that, though it has not worked well in the past. Maybe, if we specifically allocate time for IRC

Re: [ilugd] [Freed] Meeting for Freed.in discussion, 3pm, Sun., 30/12, JNU

2007-12-28 Thread Pradeepto Bhattacharya
Hi, On Dec 28, 2007 12:11 PM, Gora Mohanty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Looking at the recent interest in the direction taken > by Freed.in, I thought that it would be useful to have > an ILUG-Delhi meeting as soon as possible. Please do > remember that Freed.in is what the community wants

Re: [ilugd] [Freed] Meeting for Freed.in discussion, 3pm, Sun., 30/12, JNU

2007-12-27 Thread Linux Lingam
dear gora, On Dec 28, 2007 12:11 PM, Gora Mohanty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Here are the details: >Event: ILUG-Delhi meeting >Date:Sun., Dec. 30th >Time:15:00 (3.00pm) >Agenda: > o Direction, and scope for Freed.in > o Specific plans for