Re: [ilugd] KDE rules

2006-01-02 Thread Sirtaj Singh Kang
On Sunday 01 January 2006 20:20, Raj Mathur wrote: [snip] I'd switch to amarok from XMMS, except I can't find a balance control anywhere. Since my speakers are at not both at the same distance from where I sit, that's absolutely essential for me. And no thanks, I don't need the volume

Re: [ilugd] KDE rules

2006-01-02 Thread Raj Mathur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Taj == Sirtaj Singh Kang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Taj On Sunday 01 January 2006 20:20, Raj Mathur wrote: [snip] I'd switch to amarok from XMMS, except I can't find a balance control anywhere. Since my speakers are at not both at the

Re: [ilugd] KDE rules

2006-01-02 Thread Sirtaj Singh Kang
[snip] I decided to just sneer at those who keep telling me how I should listen to music rather than either (a) solving the problem or (b) telling me it can't be done. Damn all user-interface-design gurus who, instead of adding a feature the user wants, tell the user how s/he should ideally

Re: [ilugd] KDE rules

2006-01-02 Thread Tanveer Singh
On 1/2/06, Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Taj == Sirtaj Singh Kang [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Taj [snip] I decided to just sneer at those who keep telling me how I should listen to music rather than either (a) solving the problem or (b) telling me it can't be done.

Re: [ilugd] KDE rules

2006-01-02 Thread Raj Mathur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Abhay == Abhay Kedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Abhay On Monday 02 January 2006 20:32, Raj Mathur wrote: I decided to just sneer at those who keep telling me how I should listen to music rather than either (a) solving the problem

Re: [ilugd] KDE rules

2006-01-02 Thread Sirtaj Singh Kang
On Monday 02 January 2006 22:11, Raj Mathur wrote: [snip] That was the worst analogy it has been my misfortune to stumble across in the Happy New Year. I'm a bit disappointed with it; I was so upset about being called a usability guy that I rushed it a little. Give me a couple of months and I'm

Re: [ilugd] KDE rules

2006-01-02 Thread Raj Shekhar
in infinite wisdom Raj Mathur spoke thus On 01/03/2006 12:08 AM: Let's drop this conversation now, shall we, and find something better to flame about? BTW, Emacs rocks, [g]vi[m] sucks! http://mirror7.escomposlinux.org.nyud.net:8090/comic/ecol-08-e.png -- _.-, raj

[ilugd] KDE rules

2006-01-01 Thread nipra
Hi, No flame war intended(though I'll not mind one ;-). Just found a good article on KDE and why it rules. http://www.terra.es/personal/diegocg/kde/ Regards Nikhil Prabhakar ___ ilugd mailinglist -- ilugd@lists.linux-delhi.org

Re: [ilugd] KDE rules

2006-01-01 Thread Raj Mathur
Raj == Raj Shekhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Raj in infinite wisdom nipra spoke thus On 01/01/2006 04:44 PM: Hi, No flame war intended(though I'll not mind one ;-). Just found a good article on KDE and why it rules. http://www.terra.es/personal/diegocg/kde/ Raj I

Re: [ilugd] KDE rules

2006-01-01 Thread Tanveer Singh
On 1/1/06, Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Raj == Raj Shekhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Raj in infinite wisdom nipra spoke thus On 01/01/2006 04:44 PM: Hi, No flame war intended(though I'll not mind one ;-). Just found a good article on KDE and why it rules.

Re: [ilugd] KDE rules

2006-01-01 Thread Raj Mathur
Abhay == Abhay Kedia [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Abhay On 1/1/06, Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Raj == Raj Shekhar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'd switch to amarok from XMMS, except I can't find a balance control anywhere. Since my speakers are at not both at the