On Thursday 11 Sep 2008, Anupam Jain wrote:
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Let's pray to whatever Gods or Chaos or Probability we believe in
that they never do. GPG/PGP on a web-mail service is an oxymoron
-- the whole point of personal privacy is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Raj Mathur wrote:
Let's pray to whatever Gods or Chaos or Probability we believe in that
they never do. GPG/PGP on a web-mail service is an oxymoron -- the
whole point of personal privacy is lost if you're delegating signing
and/or
How can I show / prove that the copy of email shown by some one is not
tampered with when compared to original email?
Scenario - A sent an email to a B and D. B has tampered with the text
of email and forwarded to C. C comes to D with a print copy of email
from B. How can D show C that the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sudev Barar writes:
How can I show / prove that the copy of email shown by some one is not
tampered with when compared to original email?
Scenario - A sent an email to a B and D. B has tampered with the text
of email and forwarded to C. C comes
On 9/10/08, Sudev Barar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How can I show / prove that the copy of email shown by some one is not
tampered with when compared to original email?
Scenario - A sent an email to a B and D. B has tampered with the text
of email and forwarded to C. C comes to D with a
Scenario - A sent an email to a B and D. B has tampered
with the text
of email and forwarded to C. C comes to D with a print copy
of email
from B. How can D show C that the original email by A and
forwarded
email by C are modified. D has shown C the original from A
but C is
not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Nishant Sharma wrote:
Scenario - A sent an email to a B and D. B has tampered
with the text
of email and forwarded to C. C comes to D with a print copy
of email
from B. How can D show C that the original email by A and
2008/9/11 आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
but C is
not convinced and is casting aspersion on A and D of
showing tampered
emails.
A basic check that I will do is - get full mail headers of mail sent to D and
of that sent to C, read headers from bottom to up to find the
2008/9/11 Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday 11 Sep 2008, Sudev Barar wrote:
[snip]
How does pgp signature generate hash and is there something out there
which could be fed in given text and public key of A to generate hash
and compare it with hash appearing on the emaiil copy or C as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sudev Barar wrote:
2008/9/11 आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
but C is
not convinced and is casting aspersion on A and D of
showing tampered
emails.
A basic check that I will do is - get full mail headers of mail
2008/9/11 आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How does pgp signature generate hash and is there something out there
which could be fed in given text and public key of A to generate hash
and compare it with hash appearing on the emaiil copy or C as
forwarded by B?
Good time to start using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sudev Barar wrote:
Good time to start using PGP :). Lets have a key-signing party this software
freedom day :).
Yes. But I am using gmail for list work and that does not (yet?)
support signing. Better that I move to using MUA for all mails.
So
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sudev Barar wrote:
2008/9/11 आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
How does pgp signature generate hash and is there something out there
which could be fed in given text and public key of A to generate hash
and compare it
On Thursday 11 Sep 2008, Sudev Barar wrote:
2008/9/11 Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If your mail program supports GPG/PGP (as most modern MUAs do), it
will verify the hashes and signatures automatically. You don't
need to start doing the hashing and verifying the signatures
manually.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
? Ashish Shukla wrote:
/me points sudev to http://getfiregpg.org/install.html
Well, that has only support for inline PGP atm, and this list doesn't like
MIME
attachements :).
Thanks. And Ashish, this is what I get on your signature
On Thursday 11 Sep 2008, Sudev Barar wrote:
2008/9/11 आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Good time to start using PGP :). Lets have a key-signing party this
software freedom day :).
Yes. But I am using gmail for list work and that does not (yet?)
support signing. Better that I
On Thu, Sep 11, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Raj Mathur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 11 Sep 2008, Sudev Barar wrote:
2008/9/11 आशीष शुक्ल Ashish Shukla [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Good time to start using PGP :). Lets have a key-signing party this
software freedom day :).
Yes. But I am using gmail for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sudev Barar wrote:
? Ashish Shukla wrote:
/me points sudev to http://getfiregpg.org/install.html
Well, that has only support for inline PGP atm, and this list doesn't like
MIME
attachements :).
Thanks. And
18 matches
Mail list logo
