: Sunday, September 28, 2003 11:53 AM
Subject: [ilugd] Openoffice 1.1 RCs and other publishing questions
___
ilugd mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://frodo.hserus.net/mailman/listinfo/ilugd
. PDF are
usually considered low resolution of what you will be getting. They are
only good for previewing.
Not necessarily. I think a lot depends on the fonts. PDF files were
created (IIRC) to assist creating online formatted documents
I worked in an advertising company for sometime in Goa. Usually when we
gave out the files for printing, the printers were satisfied by the
Postscript files. However some of the printers wanted a Corel Draw file,
though I suspect in the end they turned them to PS files. PDF are
usually
i tend to disagree on some issues here. PDF has commoditized postscript,
and bridged the 'digital divide' between the advanced users and
beginners. as a macintosh user since 1984 i can tell you ...
Very interesting. Many things here I didn't know. Thanks. :)
I don't have first-hand experience
I have been trying out openoffice RCs for the last few weeks. Especially
the WRiter. Currently I am using 1.1RC4(on both Windoze and Linux), and
downloading 1.1RC5(for windoze).
One really amazing feature of Openoffice is integrated export to PDF in
three forms - optimize for screen, print and
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 11:53, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
One really amazing feature of Openoffice is integrated export to PDF in
three forms - optimize for screen, print and type-quality. No more
installing of software like pdfcreator etc. to create PDF files
(sometime of not that great
On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 11:53, Sandip Bhattacharya wrote:
One question that I wanted to ask guys into publishing in this list. How
far does a PDF go into helping typesetting people?
I worked in an advertising company for sometime in Goa. Usually when we
gave out the files for printing, the
