Re: [ilugd] Sendmail Question

2004-08-11 Thread Varun Varma
anil bindal wrote: RH 7.3/sendmail-8.11.6-27.73/ build sendmail.cf with m4 Ok - I haven't used sendmail in quite a while, so my answers may be off-track. Two possibilities emerge: -> Is there some sort of transparent NAT happening before the mail reaches your MX? E.g. The external client connect

Re: [ilugd] Sendmail Question

2004-08-08 Thread anil bindal
RH 7.3/sendmail-8.11.6-27.73/ build sendmail.cf with m4 even rDNS does not work !! rgds anil On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 01:01, Varun Varma wrote: > anil bindal wrote: > > Our back end MX is a sendmail server which has relay from MX disabled. > > > > dnl FEATURE(relay_based_on_MX)dnl > > > > Als

Re: [ilugd] Sendmail Question

2004-08-07 Thread Varun Varma
anil bindal wrote: Our back end MX is a sendmail server which has relay from MX disabled. dnl FEATURE(relay_based_on_MX)dnl Also RBL has been implemented.. FEATURE(`dnsbl', `bl.spamcop.net', `"450 Mail from spam source " $`'&{client_addr} " refused - see http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml";') FEATURE(`dn

Re: [ilugd] Sendmail Question

2004-08-06 Thread Ankur Rohatgi
On 08/05/2004 02:47 PM, anil bindal wrote: Thanks. Headers of SPAM emails show that emails are at times delivered directly to our email server MX record for Email server is must to act as back up in case of SMTP gateway failure. Solution being used is from Symantec. There you go, this is the proble

Re: [ilugd] Sendmail Question

2004-08-05 Thread anil bindal
Our back end MX is a sendmail server which has relay from MX disabled. dnl FEATURE(relay_based_on_MX)dnl Also RBL has been implemented.. FEATURE(`dnsbl', `bl.spamcop.net', `"450 Mail from spam source " $`'&{client_addr} " refused - see http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml";') FEATURE(`dnsbl', `sbl-xbl.

Re: [ilugd] Sendmail Question

2004-08-05 Thread Varun Varma
anil bindal wrote: Thanks. Headers of SPAM emails show that emails are at times delivered directly to our email server MX record for Email server is must to act as back up in case of SMTP gateway failure. Solution being used is from Symantec. Sending mails directly to the backup MXs, instead of th

Re: [ilugd] Sendmail Question

2004-08-05 Thread anil bindal
Thanks. Headers of SPAM emails show that emails are at times delivered directly to our email server MX record for Email server is must to act as back up in case of SMTP gateway failure. Solution being used is from Symantec. regards anil On Thu, 2004-08-05 at 14:28, Anand Kapoor wrote: > Anil,

Re: [ilugd] Sendmail Question

2004-08-05 Thread Anand Kapoor
Anil, I can think of only two scenarios ! One you anti SPAM/anti Virus gateway is not blocking certain mails. If you are certain that that is not the case, then check the MX records for your domain. It is possible that you have listed you mail server there as well (maybe on a lower priority tho

[ilugd] Sendmail Question

2004-08-05 Thread anil bindal
Hi all, Currently we are receiving the external emails on an SMTP Anti Virus and Anti SPAM gateway server which relays the emails to mail server after scanning. Problem is that we still get the SPAM directly on our email server. How come the SPAM emails are not delivered to Gateway first but dire