On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Geert Dekkers wrote:
> (I just resent this message as I couldn't it find it on the digest even
> after days - again, I apologise for any cross-posting)
It's in the image-sig archive, at least:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/image-sig/2009-May/005709.html
Hi all
(I just resent this message as I couldn't it find it on the digest
even after days - again, I apologise for any cross-posting)
Below is a piece of code that I found over in the quartz-dev list.
I've been using this function unchanged in a batch processor, and it
appears to leak memory
Hi all
Below is a piece of code that I found over in the quartz-dev list.
I've been using this function unchanged in a batch processor, and it
appears to leak memory quite substantially. So much so that my test
machine (1Gb memory) , a mac mini, and my production xserve (2 Gb
memory) both
